BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17187995)

  • 1. Localization of individual area neuronal activity.
    Hironaga N; Ioannides AA
    Neuroimage; 2007 Feb; 34(4):1519-34. PubMed ID: 17187995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporally constrained ICA: an application to artifact rejection in electromagnetic brain signal analysis.
    James CJ; Gibson OJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 50(9):1108-16. PubMed ID: 12943278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of mutual information on independent component analysis in EEG/MEG analysis: a simulation study.
    Neumann A; Grosse-Wentrup M; Buss M; Gramann K
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 118(11):1534-46. PubMed ID: 18853332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings.
    Vigário R; Särelä J; Jousmäki V; Hämäläinen M; Oja E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 May; 47(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 10851802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving MEG source localizations: an automated method for complete artifact removal based on independent component analysis.
    Mantini D; Franciotti R; Romani GL; Pizzella V
    Neuroimage; 2008 Mar; 40(1):160-73. PubMed ID: 18155928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel method for reliable and fast extraction of neuronal EEG/MEG oscillations on the basis of spatio-spectral decomposition.
    Nikulin VV; Nolte G; Curio G
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(4):1528-35. PubMed ID: 21276858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Independent component analysis of short-time Fourier transforms for spontaneous EEG/MEG analysis.
    Hyvärinen A; Ramkumar P; Parkkonen L; Hari R
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):257-71. PubMed ID: 19699307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of an independent component analysis approach for artifact identification and removal in magnetoencephalographic signals.
    Barbati G; Porcaro C; Zappasodi F; Rossini PM; Tecchio F
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 May; 115(5):1220-32. PubMed ID: 15066548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artifact removal in magnetoencephalogram background activity with independent component analysis.
    Escudero J; Hornero R; Abásolo D; Fernández A; López-Coronado M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):1965-73. PubMed ID: 18018691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neuronal currents and EEG-MEG fields.
    Dassios G
    Math Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 25(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 18413352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recovering EEG brain signals: artifact suppression with wavelet enhanced independent component analysis.
    Castellanos NP; Makarov VA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Dec; 158(2):300-12. PubMed ID: 16828877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rejection of stimulus-related MEG artifacts using independent component analysis.
    Iwaki S; Yamamoto C; Tonoike M; Yamamoto T
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():17. PubMed ID: 16012619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of amplitude and phase statistics for complete artifact removal in independent components of neuromagnetic recordings.
    Dammers J; Schiek M; Boers F; Silex C; Zvyagintsev M; Pietrzyk U; Mathiak K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2353-62. PubMed ID: 18838360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Independent Components Analysis (ICA) in the study of electroencephalographic signals].
    Urrestarazu E; Iriarte J
    Neurologia; 2005; 20(6):299-310. PubMed ID: 16007513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Independent components of magnetoencephalography: localization.
    Tang AC; Pearlmutter BA; Malaszenko NA; Phung DB; Reeb BC
    Neural Comput; 2002 Aug; 14(8):1827-58. PubMed ID: 12180404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shifted factor analysis for the separation of evoked dependent MEG signals.
    Kohl F; Wübbeler G; Kolossa D; Bär M; Orglmeister R; Elster C
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4219-30. PubMed ID: 20616402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-automatic identification of independent components representing EEG artifact.
    Viola FC; Thorne J; Edmonds B; Schneider T; Eichele T; Debener S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 19345611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A probabilistic algorithm integrating source localization and noise suppression for MEG and EEG data.
    Zumer JM; Attias HT; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):102-15. PubMed ID: 17574444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of SOBI components from high-density EEG.
    Tang AC; Sutherland MT; McKinney CJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(2):539-53. PubMed ID: 15784433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing ICA-based and single-trial topographic ERP analyses.
    De Lucia M; Michel CM; Murray MM
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Jun; 23(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 20422446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.