These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17188041)
1. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Roberts CJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17188041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients. Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK. Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Mahmoud AM; Yoon EY; Roberts CJ; Pepose JS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1774-88. PubMed ID: 19781475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Kirwan C; O'Keefe M J Refract Surg; 2008 Apr; 24(4):366-70. PubMed ID: 18500086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. Siganos DS; Papastergiou GI; Moedas C J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):746-51. PubMed ID: 15093634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery. Aristeidou AP; Labiris G; Katsanos A; Fanariotis M; Foudoulakis NC; Kozobolis VP Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 249(5):767-73. PubMed ID: 20577756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraocular Pressure Changes and Relationship With Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK. Li H; Wang Y; Dou R; Wei P; Zhang J; Zhao W; Li L Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 57(10):4180-6. PubMed ID: 27548888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Intraocular pressure, ocular blood flow, and corneal biomechanics changes after LASIK surgery for myopia]. Avetisov SE; Mamikonyan VR; Shmeleva-Demir OA; Karamyan AA; Bubnova IA; Kazaryan EE; Galoyan NS; Karapetyan AT Vestn Oftalmol; 2016; 132(4):24-28. PubMed ID: 27600891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of mild to moderate myopic correction by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on intraocular pressure measurements with goldmann applanation tonometer, tono-pen, and pneumatonometer. Vakili R; Choudhri SA; Tauber S; Shields MB J Glaucoma; 2002 Dec; 11(6):493-6. PubMed ID: 12483093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and their association with intraocular pressure and the central corneal curvature. Franco S; Lira M Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Nov; 92(6):469-75. PubMed ID: 19694758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Sep; 44(9):3790-4. PubMed ID: 12939293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following Femto-LASIK using Goldman applanation tonometry and ocular response analyzer. Hemida AY; Said OM; Abdel-Meguid AAE; Iqbal M; Badawi AE Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 32420226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty. Chou CY; Jordan CA; McGhee CN; Patel DV Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes? Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraocular pressure instrument reading comparisons after LASIK. Fan F; Li C; Li Y; Duan X; Pan D Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 88(7):850-4. PubMed ID: 21499165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]