BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17188202)

  • 1. A critical review of measurement uncertainty in the enumeration of food micro-organisms.
    Corry JE; Jarvis B; Passmore S; Hedges A
    Food Microbiol; 2007 May; 24(3):230-53. PubMed ID: 17188202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.
    Augustin JC; Carlier V
    Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of measurement uncertainty for quantitative methods of analysis: comparative assessment of the precision (uncertainty) of bacterial colony counts.
    Jarvis B; Hedges AJ; Corry JE
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 May; 116(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17316860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement uncertainty of the EU methods for microbiological examination of red meat.
    Corry JE; Hedges AJ; Jarvis B
    Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 24(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 17418317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of the number of sample units tested on the precision of microbial colony counts.
    Jarvis B; Hedges AJ
    Food Microbiol; 2011 Sep; 28(6):1211-9. PubMed ID: 21645822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining the microbiological criteria for lot rejection from the performance objective or food safety objective.
    Whiting RC; Rainosek A; Buchanan RL; Miliotis M; Labarre D; Long W; Ruple A; Schaub S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 110(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 16784791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of measurement uncertainty from proficiency testing schemes, internal laboratory quality monitoring and during routine enforcement examination of foods.
    Jarvis B; Corry JE; Hedges AJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 17650207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modern microbiological methods for foods: colony count and direct count methods. A review.
    García-Armesto MR; Prieto M; García-López ML; Otero A; Moreno B
    Microbiologia; 1993 Apr; 9(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8397961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of NMKL method No. 136--Listeria monocytogenes, detection and enumeration in foods and feed.
    Loncarevic S; Økland M; Sehic E; Norli HS; Johansson T
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 May; 124(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 18472176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The contribution of sampling uncertainty to total measurement uncertainty in the enumeration of microorganisms in foods.
    Jarvis B; Hedges AJ; Corry JE
    Food Microbiol; 2012 Jun; 30(2):362-71. PubMed ID: 22365349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance characteristics and estimation of measurement uncertainty of three plating procedures for Campylobacter enumeration in chicken meat.
    Habib I; Sampers I; Uyttendaele M; Berkvens D; De Zutter L
    Food Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 25(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17993378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying uncertainty associated with microbial count data: a Bayesian approach.
    Clough HE; Clancy D; O'Neill PD; Robinson SE; French NP
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):610-6. PubMed ID: 16011711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quantitative microbiological analysis--impacting factors as demonstrated with the aerobic plate count].
    Fries R
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004 May; 111(5):188-92. PubMed ID: 15233336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of pathogenic micro-organisms--a contribution to discussion.
    Glaeser H
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004 May; 111(5):193-5. PubMed ID: 15233337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative risk assessment: is more complex always better? Simple is not stupid and complex is not always more correct.
    Zwietering MH
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Aug; 134(1-2):57-62. PubMed ID: 19171404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the relationship between most probable number (MPN) and colony-forming unit (CFU) estimates of fecal coliform concentration.
    Gronewold AD; Wolpert RL
    Water Res; 2008 Jul; 42(13):3327-34. PubMed ID: 18490046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of sensitivity analysis to aid interpretation of a probabilistic Bacillus cereus spore lag time model applied to heat-treated chilled foods (REPFEDs).
    Membré JM; Kan-King-Yu D; Blackburn Cde W
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 128(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 18691785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The determinacy of reproducibility assessments of qualitative microbial food borne pathogen methods detecting a few microbes per analytical portion.
    Hitchins AD
    Food Microbiol; 2011 Sep; 28(6):1140-4. PubMed ID: 21645812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement uncertainty in microbiology.
    Forster LI
    J AOAC Int; 2003; 86(5):1089-94. PubMed ID: 14632415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Sampling plans in microbiological criteria for food and their "performance criteria"].
    Dahms S; Hildebrandt G; Weiss H; Arndt G
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2001; 114(11-12):465-9. PubMed ID: 11766275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.