BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17188555)

  • 1. Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy.
    Ullman S
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Feb; 11(2):58-64. PubMed ID: 17188555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition invariance obtained by extended and invariant features.
    Ullman S; Bart E
    Neural Netw; 2004; 17(5-6):833-48. PubMed ID: 15288901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Top-down facilitation of visual object recognition: object-based and context-based contributions.
    Fenske MJ; Aminoff E; Gronau N; Bar M
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 155():3-21. PubMed ID: 17027376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mutual information of image fragments predicts categorization in humans: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Harel A; Ullman S; Epshtein B; Bentin S
    Vision Res; 2007 Jul; 47(15):2010-20. PubMed ID: 17499835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of familiarity in the recognition of static and dynamic objects.
    Bülthoff I; Newell FN
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 154():315-25. PubMed ID: 17010720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity dependency of the change in ERP component N1 accompanying with the object recognition learning.
    Tokudome W; Wang G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 22115890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Invariant visual object recognition: a model, with lighting invariance.
    Rolls ET; Stringer SM
    J Physiol Paris; 2006; 100(1-3):43-62. PubMed ID: 17071062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling categorization of scenes containing consistent versus inconsistent objects.
    Mack ML; Palmeri TJ
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):11.1-11. PubMed ID: 20377288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonaccidental properties underlie shape recognition in Mammalian and nonmammalian vision.
    Gibson BM; Lazareva OF; Gosselin F; Schyns PG; Wasserman EA
    Curr Biol; 2007 Feb; 17(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 17275301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A model for learning topographically organized parts-based representations of objects in visual cortex: topographic nonnegative matrix factorization.
    Hosoda K; Watanabe M; Wersing H; Körner E; Tsujino H; Tamura H; Fujita I
    Neural Comput; 2009 Sep; 21(9):2605-33. PubMed ID: 19548799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms.
    Serre T; Wolf L; Bileschi S; Riesenhuber M; Poggio T
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2007 Mar; 29(3):411-26. PubMed ID: 17224612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning optimized features for hierarchical models of invariant object recognition.
    Wersing H; Körner E
    Neural Comput; 2003 Jul; 15(7):1559-88. PubMed ID: 12816566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined top-down/bottom-up segmentation.
    Borenstein E; Ullman S
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Dec; 30(12):2109-25. PubMed ID: 18988946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: how spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds.
    Fazl A; Grossberg S; Mingolla E
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 18653176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How position dependent is visual object recognition?
    Kravitz DJ; Vinson LD; Baker CI
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 Mar; 12(3):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast- and illumination-invariant object recognition from active sensation.
    Rentschler I; Osman E; Jüttner M
    Spat Vis; 2009; 22(5):383-96. PubMed ID: 19814902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "category-specific" neuropsychological deficits.
    Humphreys GW; Forde EM
    Behav Brain Sci; 2001 Jun; 24(3):453-76; discussion 476-509. PubMed ID: 11682799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Object recognition by artificial cortical maps.
    Plebe A; Domenella RG
    Neural Netw; 2007 Sep; 20(7):763-80. PubMed ID: 17604954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention in hierarchical models of object recognition.
    Walther DB; Koch C
    Prog Brain Res; 2007; 165():57-78. PubMed ID: 17925240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A developmental dissociation of view-dependent and view-invariant object recognition in adolescence.
    Jüttner M; Müller A; Rentschler I
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 175(2):420-4. PubMed ID: 17055074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.