BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17188566)

  • 1. Signal-to-noise ratio of chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Boesveldt S; Haehner A; Berendse HW; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):690-5. PubMed ID: 17188566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration.
    Stuck BA; Frey S; Freiburg C; Hörmann K; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 117(6):1367-75. PubMed ID: 16651024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intranasal chemoreception in patients with multiple chemical sensitivities: a double-blind investigation.
    Hummel T; Roscher S; Jaumann MP; Kobal G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Aug; 24(1 Pt 2):S79-86. PubMed ID: 8921561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lateralisation of intranasal trigeminal chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Rombaux P; Guérit JM; Mouraux A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2008 Feb; 38(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18329547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responses to olfactory and intranasal trigeminal stimuli: relation to the respiratory cycle.
    Haehner A; Gruenewald G; Dibenedetto M; Hummel T
    Neuroscience; 2011 Feb; 175():178-83. PubMed ID: 21145944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender differences in chemosensory perception and event-related potentials.
    Olofsson JK; Nordin S
    Chem Senses; 2004 Sep; 29(7):629-37. PubMed ID: 15337687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of short inter-stimulus intervals on olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials.
    Kassab A; Schaub F; Vent J; Hüttenbrink KB; Damm M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Nov; 129(11):1250-6. PubMed ID: 19863320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chemosensory event-related potentials during sleep--a pilot study.
    Stuck BA; Weitz H; Hörmann K; Maurer JT; Hummel T
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Oct; 406(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 16934401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of olfactory and trigeminal function using chemosensory event-related potentials.
    Rombaux P; Mouraux A; Bertrand B; Guerit JM; Hummel T
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2006; 36(2):53-62. PubMed ID: 16844543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Olfactory and chemosomatosensory function in pregnant women assessed with event-related potentials.
    Olofsson JK; Broman DA; Wulff M; Martinkauppi M; Nordin S
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Sep; 86(1-2):252-7. PubMed ID: 16112693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The neural representation of odor is modulated by the presence of a trigeminal stimulus during odor encoding.
    Bensafi M; Frasnelli J; Reden J; Hummel T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):696-701. PubMed ID: 17208517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time-frequency analysis of chemosensory event-related potentials to characterize the cortical representation of odors in humans.
    Huart C; Legrain V; Hummel T; Rombaux P; Mouraux A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33221. PubMed ID: 22427997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemosensory event-related potentials in early blind humans.
    Cuevas I; Plaza P; Rombaux P; Mouraux A; Delbeke J; Collignon O; De Volder AG; Renier L
    B-ENT; 2011; 7(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 21563551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chemosensory event-related brain potentials (CSERP) after strictly monorhinal stimulation.
    Gudziol H; Fischer J; Bitter T; Guntinas-Lichius O
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Sep; 93(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 24952214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-retest reliability of chemosensory evoked potentials.
    Welge-Lüssen A; Wille C; Renner B; Kobal G
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Apr; 20(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 12766687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of chemosensory function using electroencephalographic techniques.
    Rombaux P; Huart C; Mouraux A
    Rhinology; 2012 Mar; 50(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 22469600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Co-stimulation with an olfactory stimulus increases arousal responses to trigeminal stimulation.
    Stuck BA; Baja J; Lenz F; Herr RM; Heiser C
    Neuroscience; 2011 Mar; 176():442-6. PubMed ID: 21223995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing Olfactory Function in Parkinson's Disease via Entropy Analysis of Chemosensory Event Related Potentials.
    Guducu C; Taslica S; Cakmur R; Ozgoren M; Ikiz AO; Oniz A
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2015 Oct; 237(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 26412299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are there sex-related differences in responses to repetitive olfactory/trigeminal stimuli?
    Scheibe M; Opatz O; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Aug; 266(8):1323-6. PubMed ID: 19002476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trigeminal evoked potentials in man: a new olfactory stimulation device.
    Lago P; Broich G; Cecchini AP; Sandrini G; Guizzetti G; Callieco R; Zambarbieri D; Nappi G
    Funct Neurol; 1998; 13(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 9626598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.