159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17190230)
1. Influence of the facial pattern on ANB, AF-BF, and Wits appraisal.
Tanaka JL; Ono E; Filho Medici E; Cesar de Moraes L; Cezar de Melo Castilho J; Leonelli de Moraes ME
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 17190230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
Del Santo M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment and predictability of ANB angle.
Chandra PK; Godfrey K
Aust Orthod J; 1990 Mar; 11(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 2152434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability.
Ishikawa H; Nakamura S; Iwasaki H; Kitazawa S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 10842115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of cephalometric analyses for assessing sagittal jaw relationship.
Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Nov; 18(11):679-83. PubMed ID: 18983790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements.
Oktay H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Feb; 99(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 1990821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications.
Bishara SE; Fahl JA; Peterson LC
Am J Orthod; 1983 Aug; 84(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 6576637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of craniofacial morphology in monozygotic twins with their siblings.
Sorin MS; Ramsey TC; Hart TC; Farrington FH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1991; 15(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 1878327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Zamora N; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 Jul; 18(4):e725-32. PubMed ID: 23722136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The wits appraisal using three reference planes and its interaction with the ANB angle among a sub-set of Nigerians".
Ifesanya JU; Adeyemi AT; Otuyemi OD
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 43(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 26223140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "Wits" appraisal in southern Chinese children.
So LL; Davis PJ; King NM
Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2316903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of functional versus bisected occlusal planes on the Wits appraisal.
Thayer TA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 2333856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting the "Wits" appraisal from the ANB angle.
Rotberg S; Fried N; Kane J; Shapiro E
Am J Orthod; 1980 Jun; 77(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 6930164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study.
Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Ciusa V; Morini M; Sforza C
Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 12518952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Floating norms for individualising the ANB angle and the WITS appraisal in orthodontic cephalometric analysis based on guiding variables.
Paddenberg E; Proff P; Kirschneck C
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jan; 84(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 34255093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cross-sectional analysis of Wits and Riedel in adults with skeletal III malocclusion: How informative are they?
Oliver GR; Grimes K; Pandis N; Fleming PS
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 29624856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia GM
Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10534977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric Floating Norms for the
Perinetti G; Ceschi M; Scalia A; Contardo L
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():8740731. PubMed ID: 29850584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of the anterior and posterior length and deflection angle of the cranial base, in individuals with facial Pattern I, II and III.
Thiesen G; Pletsch G; Zastrow MD; do Valle CV; do Valle-Corotti KM; Patel MP; Conti PC
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 23876952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
