These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

654 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17191061)

  • 1. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.
    Drukteinis S; Balciuniene I
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 17191061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cleaning efficiency of anatomic endodontic technology, ProFile System and Manual Instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an in vitro study.
    Reddy ES; Sainath D; Narenderreddy M; Pasari S; Vallikanthan S; Sindhurareddy G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 24309340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
    Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
    Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation.
    Salman MI; Baumann MA; Hellmich M; Roggendorf MJ; Termaat S
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 20518928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kamel WH; Kataia EM
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of root canal taper on its cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Arvaniti IS; Khabbaz MG
    J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):871-4. PubMed ID: 21787508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study.
    Ghivari S; Kubasad G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 22406709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of three different retreatment techniques in canals filled with compacted gutta-percha or Thermafil: a scanning electron microscope study.
    Pirani C; Pelliccioni GA; Marchionni S; Montebugnoli L; Piana G; Prati C
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1433-40. PubMed ID: 19801246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of GT rotary instruments.
    Gambarini G; Laszkiewicz J
    Int Endod J; 2002 May; 35(5):422-7. PubMed ID: 12059912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation.
    Pérez-Heredia M; Ferrer-Luque CM; González-Rodríguez MP
    J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):993-7. PubMed ID: 16982281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Smear layer production by 3 rotary reamers with different cutting blade designs in straight root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Jeon IS; Spångberg LS; Yoon TC; Kazemi RB; Kum KY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):601-7. PubMed ID: 14600696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.