693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17191184)
1. Evaluation of early corneal endothelial cell loss in bimanual microincision cataract surgery (MICS) in comparison with standard phacoemulsification.
Wilczynski M; Drobniewski I; Synder A; Omulecki W
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2006; 16(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 17191184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
Kahraman G; Amon M; Franz C; Prinz A; Abela-Formanek C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Piotr L; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19683153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bimanual microincision versus standard coaxial small-incision cataract surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Chen C; Zhu M; Sun Y; Qu X; Xu X
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 25363858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Controlled clinical trial comparing biaxial microincision with coaxial small incision for cataract surgery.
Dick HB
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(5):739-50. PubMed ID: 22267455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative analysis of early distance visual acuity in patients after coaxial phacoemulsification through the micro-incision (1.8 mm) and after standard phacoemulsification through the small incision (2.75 mm).
Orczykowska M; Owidzkaz M; Synder A; Wilczyński M; Omulecki W
Klin Oczna; 2014; 116(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 25137913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(10-12):314-20. PubMed ID: 22384647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up.
Crema AS; Walsh A; Yamane Y; Nosé W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17531696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of the selected factors on corneal endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification.
Orski M; Synder A; Pałenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W; Wilczyński M
Klin Oczna; 2014; 116(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 25345285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.
Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Thieme H; Dick HB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20117707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical results and higher-order aberrations after 1.4-mm biaxial cataract surgery and implantation of a new aspheric intraocular lens.
von Sonnleithner C; Bergholz R; Gonnermann J; Klamann MK; Torun N; Bertelmann E
Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 53(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 25471052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.
Alió J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A; Ramzy M
Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 16183129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
Park J; Yum HR; Kim MS; Harrison AR; Kim EC
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of macular thickness and inflammatory cytokine levels after microincision versus small incision coaxial cataract surgery.
Hwang HS; Ahn YJ; Lee HJ; Kim MS; Kim EC
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 94(3):e189-94. PubMed ID: 25828946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: Microincision versus standard technique.
Mencucci R; Ponchietti C; Virgili G; Giansanti F; Menchini U
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1351-4. PubMed ID: 16863974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-site phacotrabeculectomy versus bimanual microincision cataract surgery combined with trabeculectomy.
Bayer A; Erdem U; Mumcuoglu T; Akyol M
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 19123148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Gabriel P; Pfeiffer N; Dick HB
Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining factors for corneal endothelial cell loss by using bimanual microincision phacoemulsification and power modulation.
Mathys KC; Cohen KL; Armstrong BD
Cornea; 2007 Oct; 26(9):1049-55. PubMed ID: 17893532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of coaxial phacoemulsification through a 1.8-mm microincision in hard cataracts.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Omulecki W
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 21210578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
