These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17191501)

  • 1. Implementation and optimisation of the water framework directive explorer for river management in Flanders.
    Maes A; Goethals PL; De Pauw N
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(1):179-82. PubMed ID: 17191501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the impact of changes in landuse and management practices on the diffuse pollution and retention of nitrate in a riparian floodplain.
    Krause S; Jacobs J; Voss A; Bronstert A; Zehe E
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan; 389(1):149-64. PubMed ID: 17915291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Wetland management according to the Water Framework Directive 2000/60].
    Pacini N
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2005; 41(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 16552121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive coastal planning and the European Union's water framework directive: a Swedish perspective.
    Gipperth L; Elmgren R
    Ambio; 2005 Mar; 34(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 15865314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term ecological implications of the diversion of a highly polluted lowland river: a case study.
    Maidana NI; O'Farrell I; Lombardo RJ; dos Santos Afonso M
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Dec; 75(6):1176-84. PubMed ID: 16402309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward a holistic and risk-based management of European river basins.
    Brack W; Apitz SE; Borchardt D; Brils J; Cardoso AC; Foekema EM; van Gils J; Jansen S; Harris B; Hein M; Heise S; Hellsten S; de Maagd PG; Müller D; Panov VE; Posthuma L; Quevauviller P; Verdonschot PF; von der Ohe PC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jan; 5(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 19132820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design of a new monitoring network and first testing of new biological assessment methods according to water framework directive.
    Sommerhäuser M; Scharner C; Schimmer H; Schindler A; Plantikow K; Vietoris F
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):966-9. PubMed ID: 17726557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of fish community structure as a measure of ecological degradation: a case study in two tropical rivers of India.
    Das SK; Chakrabarty D
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(1):188-96. PubMed ID: 17023110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimisation of the monitoring strategy of macroinvertebrate communities in the river Dender, in relation to the EU Water Framework Directive.
    D'heygere TP; Goethals PL; De Pauw N
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Mar; 2():607-17. PubMed ID: 12805987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abiotic ecotypes in south-central Spanish rivers: reference conditions and pollution.
    Moreno JL; Navarro C; De Las Heras J
    Environ Pollut; 2006 Oct; 143(3):388-96. PubMed ID: 16458399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in European marine waters.
    Devlin M; Best M; Haynes D
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2007; 55(1-6):1-2. PubMed ID: 17055539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assessment of the status of aquatic ecosystem alteration: characterization of conservation strategies].
    Vigliotti F
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2005; 41(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 16552120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementing the water framework directive in Bulgaria: Integrated river basin management on the Black Sea coast.
    Pratt A; Lønholdt J; Jørgensen PE; Persson B; Nikolov V; Ianev R; Dontchev V; Klint M
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(11):53-61. PubMed ID: 16114617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aquatic processes and systems in perspective.
    Swackhamer DL
    J Environ Monit; 2006 May; 8(5):512. PubMed ID: 16791969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-benefit analysis and the water framework directive in Scotland.
    Hanley N; Black AR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Apr; 2(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 16646384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecological co-inhabitance index (ECI) as a management tool for ecosystem preservation in rivers.
    Yoshimura C; Kumagai Y; Fukushi K; Omura T
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 11380175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Watershed approach in water resources planning and quality management.
    Khadse GK; Nanoti MV
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2007 Jul; 49(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 18476440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent developments in estuarine ecology and management.
    Ducrotoy JP; Elliott M
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2006; 53(1-4):1-4. PubMed ID: 16600814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The monitoring of watercourses on the basis of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/CE. An integrated methodological approach applied to the appenninici rivers. First data].
    Scuri S; Grappasonni I; Petrelli F; Celestino A; Cocchioni M
    Ann Ig; 2009; 21(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 19798911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The environmental state of rivers in the Balkans--a review within the DPSIR framework.
    Skoulikidis NT
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Apr; 407(8):2501-16. PubMed ID: 19223063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.