These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17191753)

  • 1. Do conditional reinforcers count?
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Nov; 86(3):269-83. PubMed ID: 17191753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jan; 77(1):65-89. PubMed ID: 11831784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent schedules: reinforcer magnitude effects.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 May; 79(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 12908762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference pulses without reinforcers.
    McLean AP; Grace RC; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 24676669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local effects of delayed food.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Mar; 87(2):241-60. PubMed ID: 17465314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pigeons may not remember the stimuli that reinforced their recent behavior.
    Schaal DW; Odum AL; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Mar; 73(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 10784005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Briefly delayed reinforcement effects on variable-ratio and yoked-interval schedule performance.
    Holtyn AF; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 23900853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Choice in a variable environment: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement.
    Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):460-4. PubMed ID: 20188157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preferences for and against stimuli paired with food.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Jul; 72(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 10418156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus effects on local preference: stimulus-response contingencies, stimulus-food pairing, and stimulus-food correlation.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jan; 93(1):45-59. PubMed ID: 20676267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the discriminability of alternatives in three-alternative concurrent-schedule performance.
    Davison M; McCarthy D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 16812725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preference and resistance to change with constant-duration schedule components.
    Nevin JA; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):79-100. PubMed ID: 10966097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.
    Landon J; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):207-34. PubMed ID: 11394487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.
    Nevin JA; Randolph ; Holland S; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):43-74. PubMed ID: 11516115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcement: food signals the time and location of future food.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jul; 96(1):63-86. PubMed ID: 21765546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.