96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17193284)
1. Muscarinic receptors: A comparative analysis of structural features and binding modes through homology modelling and molecular docking.
Pedretti A; Vistoli G; Marconi C; Testa B
Chem Biodivers; 2006 May; 3(5):481-501. PubMed ID: 17193284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Docking analyses on human muscarinic receptors: unveiling the subtypes peculiarities in agonists binding.
Vistoli G; Pedretti A; Dei S; Scapecchi S; Marconi C; Romanelli MN
Bioorg Med Chem; 2008 Mar; 16(6):3049-58. PubMed ID: 18182302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structure and activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.
Hulme EC; Lu ZL; Saldanha JW; Bee MS
Biochem Soc Trans; 2003 Feb; 31(Pt 1):29-34. PubMed ID: 12546648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer aided comparative analysis of the binding modes of the adenosine receptor agonists for all known subtypes of adenosine receptors.
Ivanov AA; Palyulin VA; Zefirov NS
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jan; 25(5):740-54. PubMed ID: 17095272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A model for the acetylcholine binding site of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.
Luyten WH
J Neurosci Res; 1986; 16(1):51-73. PubMed ID: 3528512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Homology modeling of human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.
Thomas T; McLean KC; McRobb FM; Manallack DT; Chalmers DK; Yuriev E
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):243-53. PubMed ID: 24328076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Constitutively active muscarinic receptors.
Spalding TA; Burstein ES
Life Sci; 2001 Apr; 68(22-23):2511-6. PubMed ID: 11392620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A molecular basis for agonist and antagonist actions at GABA(C) receptors.
Abdel-Halim H; Hanrahan JR; Hibbs DE; Johnston GA; Chebib M
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Apr; 71(4):306-27. PubMed ID: 18312293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molecular modeling of A1 and A2A adenosine receptors: comparison of rhodopsin- and beta2-adrenergic-based homology models through the docking studies.
Yuzlenko O; Kieć-Kononowicz K
J Comput Chem; 2009 Jan; 30(1):14-32. PubMed ID: 18496794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The conformational and property space of acetylcholine bound to muscarinic receptors: an entropy component accounts for the subtype selectivity of acetylcholine.
Vistoli G; Pedretti A; Testa B; Matucci R
Arch Biochem Biophys; 2007 Aug; 464(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 17544360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure-function studies of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.
Leach K; Simms J; Sexton PM; Christopoulos A
Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2012; (208):29-48. PubMed ID: 22222693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structural insight into the specific interaction between murine SHPS-1/SIRP alpha and its ligand CD47.
Nakaishi A; Hirose M; Yoshimura M; Oneyama C; Saito K; Kuki N; Matsuda M; Honma N; Ohnishi H; Matozaki T; Okada M; Nakagawa A
J Mol Biol; 2008 Jan; 375(3):650-60. PubMed ID: 18045614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: structure, function subtypes and therapeutic perspectives.
Hulme EC; Birdsall NJ; Wheatley M; Curtis C; Pedder EK; Poyner D; Stockton JM; Eveleigh P
Postgrad Med J; 1987; 63 Suppl 1():5-12. PubMed ID: 3321013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Asparagine, valine, and threonine in the third extracellular loop of muscarinic receptor have essential roles in the positive cooperativity of strychnine-like allosteric modulators.
Jakubík J; Krejcí A; Dolezal V
J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2005 May; 313(2):688-96. PubMed ID: 15647330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Crystal structure of Thermus thermophilus tRNA m1A58 methyltransferase and biophysical characterization of its interaction with tRNA.
Barraud P; Golinelli-Pimpaneau B; Atmanene C; Sanglier S; Van Dorsselaer A; Droogmans L; Dardel F; Tisné C
J Mol Biol; 2008 Mar; 377(2):535-50. PubMed ID: 18262540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structure-function relationship of inhibitory Smads: Structural flexibility contributes to functional divergence.
Hariharan R; Pillai MR
Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1853-62. PubMed ID: 18175316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A highly conserved tryptophan residue in the fourth transmembrane domain of the A adenosine receptor is essential for ligand binding but not receptor homodimerization.
Suzuki T; Namba K; Yamagishi R; Kaneko H; Haga T; Nakata H
J Neurochem; 2009 Aug; 110(4):1352-62. PubMed ID: 19558453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational analysis of R and S isoforms of 12-lipoxygenases: homology modeling and docking studies.
Aparoy P; Leela T; Reddy RN; Reddanna P
J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Feb; 27(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 19147381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structural and functional characterization of binding sites in metallocarboxypeptidases based on Optimal Docking Area analysis.
Fernández D; Vendrell J; Avilés FX; Fernández-Recio J
Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 17407161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular modelling of subtypes (alpha(2A), alpha(2B) and alpha(2C)) of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors: a comparative study.
Balogh B; Szilágyi A; Gyires K; Bylund DB; Mátyus P
Neurochem Int; 2009 Nov; 55(6):355-61. PubMed ID: 19447153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
