271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17196034)
1. Stern-judging: A simple, successful norm which promotes cooperation under indirect reciprocity.
Pacheco JM; Santos FC; Chalub FA
PLoS Comput Biol; 2006 Dec; 2(12):e178. PubMed ID: 17196034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hidden patterns of reciprocity.
Syi
J Theor Biol; 2014 Mar; 345():92-8. PubMed ID: 24368125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Groupwise information sharing promotes ingroup favoritism in indirect reciprocity.
Nakamura M; Masuda N
BMC Evol Biol; 2012 Nov; 12():213. PubMed ID: 23126611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolution of norms for judging social behavior.
Kessinger TA; Tarnita CE; Plotkin JB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(24):e2219480120. PubMed ID: 37276388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails.
Rand DG; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA
J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18938180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity.
Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y
J Theor Biol; 2006 Apr; 239(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 16174521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evolution of norms.
Chalub FA; Santos FC; Pacheco JM
J Theor Biol; 2006 Jul; 241(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 16388824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human cooperation based on punishment reputation.
dos Santos M; Rankin DJ; Wedekind C
Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2446-50. PubMed ID: 23888865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
Nowak M; Sigmund K
Nature; 1993 Jul; 364(6432):56-8. PubMed ID: 8316296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Social norm complexity and past reputations in the evolution of cooperation.
Santos FP; Santos FC; Pacheco JM
Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7695):242-245. PubMed ID: 29516999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evolutionary stability of cooperation in indirect reciprocity under noisy and private assessment.
Fujimoto Y; Ohtsuki H
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 May; 120(20):e2300544120. PubMed ID: 37155910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Global analyses of evolutionary dynamics and exhaustive search for social norms that maintain cooperation by reputation.
Ohtsuki H; Iwasa Y
J Theor Biol; 2007 Feb; 244(3):518-31. PubMed ID: 17030041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A second-order stability analysis for the continuous model of indirect reciprocity.
Lee S; Murase Y; Baek SK
J Theor Biol; 2022 Sep; 548():111202. PubMed ID: 35752284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-person game facilitates indirect reciprocity under image scoring.
Suzuki S; Akiyama E
J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 17714735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Indirect reciprocity in three types of social dilemmas.
Nakamura M; Ohtsuki H
J Theor Biol; 2014 Aug; 355():117-27. PubMed ID: 24721479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indirect reciprocity can overcome free-rider problems on costly moral assessment.
Sasaki T; Okada I; Nakai Y
Biol Lett; 2016 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 27381886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tit-for-tat or win-stay, lose-shift?
Imhof LA; Fudenberg D; Nowak MA
J Theor Biol; 2007 Aug; 247(3):574-80. PubMed ID: 17481667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The evolution of conditional moral assessment in indirect reciprocity.
Sasaki T; Okada I; Nakai Y
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():41870. PubMed ID: 28150808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Large group size promotes the evolution of cooperation in the mutual-aid game.
Shimura H; Nakamaru M
J Theor Biol; 2018 Aug; 451():46-56. PubMed ID: 29709586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity.
Santos FP; Pacheco JM; Santos FC
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2021 Nov; 376(1838):20200291. PubMed ID: 34601904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
