BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17196138)

  • 1. [The effectiveness of endoscopic variceal ligation in patients with different grades of liver function].
    Zhang M; Shen W; Chen WQ; Mei ZC; Gao J
    Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Dec; 14(12):924-6. PubMed ID: 17196138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endoscopic variceal ligation combined with Hassab's procedure in preventing the recurrence of esophageal varices.
    Qi YF; Zhu SH; Liu XY; Liu B; Li RZ; Zhou P; Wang GH
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Jun; 32(3):368-72. PubMed ID: 17611310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility and potential benefit of maintenance endoscopic variceal ligation in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage: a controlled trial.
    Chen WC; Hou MC; Lin HC; Lee FY; Yeh YY; Chang FY; Lee SD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jul; 54(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 11427836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic variceal ligation plus propranolol vs. transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt: a long-term randomized trial.
    Sauer P; Hansmann J; Richter GM; Stremmel W; Stiehl A
    Endoscopy; 2002 Sep; 34(9):690-7. PubMed ID: 12195325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endoscopic variceal ligation plus propranolol versus endoscopic variceal ligation alone in primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding.
    Sarin SK; Wadhawan M; Agarwal SR; Tyagi P; Sharma BC
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Apr; 100(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 15784021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors predicting success of endoscopic variceal ligation for secondary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding.
    Harewood GC; Baron TH; Song LM
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jan; 21(1 Pt 2):237-41. PubMed ID: 16460480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation and its correlation with liver function].
    Song R; Chen WQ; He L; Mei ZC; Wu SH; He S; Gao J; Shen W
    Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 18(12):886-9. PubMed ID: 21205471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic variceal ligation in prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with high-risk esophageal varices.
    Lay CS; Tsai YT; Teg CY; Shyu WS; Guo WS; Wu KL; Lo KJ
    Hepatology; 1997 Jun; 25(6):1346-50. PubMed ID: 9185751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic variceal ligation versus endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic sclerotherapy: a prospective randomized study.
    Bhargava DK; Pokharna R
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1997 Jun; 92(6):950-3. PubMed ID: 9177508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of characteristics of recurrent esophageal varices after endoscopic ligation versus endoscopic ligation plus sclerotherapy.
    Yoshida H; Tajiri T; Mamada Y; Taniai N; Hirakata A; Kawano Y; Mizuguchi Y; Shimizu T; Takahashi T
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(56):457-61. PubMed ID: 15086182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal hemorrhage in pre-liver transplant patients.
    Lim EJ; Gow PJ; Angus PW
    Liver Transpl; 2009 Nov; 15(11):1508-13. PubMed ID: 19877221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three years experience with endoscopic variceal ligation for treatment of bleeding varices.
    Goff JS; Reveille RM; Stiegmann GV
    Endoscopy; 1992 Jun; 24(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 1505488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic variceal ligation. Experience in 78 patients.
    Liu XY; Yu J; Lu XS; Liu S; Shen LR; Zhang YD; Han M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1993 Sep; 106(9):668-70. PubMed ID: 8287701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of emergency endoscopic variceal ligation plus octreotide in the treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients].
    Zhang Y; Chen SY; Yu XF; Zhao SM; Wang YQ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2006 May; 27(5):433-6. PubMed ID: 16981343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing banding ligation with sclerotherapy of esophageal varices.
    Masci E; Stigliano R; Mariani A; Bertoni G; Baroncini D; Cennamo V; Micheletti G; Casetti T; Tansini P; Buscarini E; Ranzato R; Norberto L
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(27):1769-73. PubMed ID: 10430341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors and survival of early bleeding after esophageal variceal ligation.
    Yang MT; Chen HS; Lee HC; Lin CL
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2007 Sep; 54(78):1705-9. PubMed ID: 18019699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic variceal ligation versus propranolol in prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.
    Lay CS; Tsai YT; Lee FY; Lai YL; Yu CJ; Chen CB; Peng CY
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Feb; 21(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 16509867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) combined with partial splenic embolization (PSE).
    Taniai N; Onda M; Tajiri T; Toba M; Yoshida H
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(29):2849-53. PubMed ID: 10576359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Embolization combined with endoscopic variceal ligation for the treatment of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.
    Huang LY; Cui J; Wu CR; Liu YX
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Jan; 120(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 17254485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized control trial of bi-monthly versus bi-weekly endoscopic variceal ligation of esophageal varices.
    Yoshida H; Mamada Y; Taniai N; Yamamoto K; Kawano Y; Mizuguchi Y; Shimizu T; Takahashi T; Tajiri T
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 100(9):2005-9. PubMed ID: 16128945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.