761 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17197013)
21. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer.
Renaud MC; Plante M; Roy M
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11006032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer--preliminary experience among Chinese.
Chu KK; Chang SD; Chen FP; Soong YK
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jan; 64(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8995546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.
Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix--3 years' experience].
Bosković V; Glisić A; Petković S
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(5-6):183-7. PubMed ID: 9863378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
Pellegrino A; Villa A; Fruscio R; Signorelli M; Meroni MG; Iedà N; Vitobello D
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2008 Oct; 18(5):474-8. PubMed ID: 18936669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Isolated full-thickness cervical stromal invasion warrants post-hysterectomy pelvic radiotherapy in FIGO stages IB-IIA uterine cervical carcinoma.
Moon SH; Wu HG; Ha SW; Lee HP; Kang SB; Song YS; Park NH; Kim JW; Park IA; Kim BH
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan; 104(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 16935323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Clinical analysis of radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with malignant uterine tumors: laparoscopy versus laparotomy].
He YL; Zhang LY; Yang J; Pan SL; Peng DX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 May; 39(5):308-10. PubMed ID: 15196411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ciravolo G; Volpi E; Uccella S; Rampinelli F; Bergamini V
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Sep; 106(3):502-6. PubMed ID: 17553554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: extraperitoneal versus laparoscopic approach.
Larciprete G; Casalino B; Segatore MF; Jarvis S; Catarinella V; Cirese E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 16359771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Survival for stage IB cervical cancer with positive lymph node involvement: a comparison of completed vs. abandoned radical hysterectomy.
Richard SD; Krivak TC; Castleberry A; Beriwal S; Kelley JL; Edwards RP; Sukumvanich P
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18234297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Laparoscopic management of occult cervical cancer discovered after simple hysterectomy].
Vignancour S; Narducci F; Collinet P; Vinatier D; Castelain B; Leblanc E
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 17337353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Analysis of postoperative complications of radical hysterectomy for 219 cervical cancer patients].
Wu K; Zhang WH; Zhang R; Li H; Bai P; Li XG
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 28(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 16875638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.
Jackson KS; Das N; Naik R; Lopes AD; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH; Monaghan JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 15581978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
