223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17197327)
1. Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty.
Kurtz SM; van Ooij A; Ross R; de Waal Malefijt J; Peloza J; Ciccarelli L; Villarraga ML
Spine J; 2007; 7(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 17197327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polyethylene wear debris and long-term clinical failure of the Charité disc prosthesis: a study of 4 patients.
van Ooij A; Kurtz SM; Stessels F; Noten H; van Rhijn L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 17224818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component.
Kurtz SM; Peloza J; Siskey R; Villarraga ML
Spine J; 2005; 5(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 15863092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo functional performance of failed Prodisc-L devices: retrieval analysis of lumbar total disc replacements.
Lebl DR; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Wright T; Abjornson C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1209-17. PubMed ID: 22531474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The natural history of polyethylene oxidation in total disc replacement.
Kurtz SM; MacDonald D; Ianuzzi A; van Ooij A; Isaza J; Ross ER; Regan J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2369-77. PubMed ID: 19789469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the correlation of in vivo wear and damage patterns with in vitro TDR motion response?
Kurtz SM; Patwardhan A; MacDonald D; Ciccarelli L; van Ooij A; Lorenz M; Zindrick M; O'Leary P; Isaza J; Ross R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 18317190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a clinically relevant impingement test method for a mobile bearing lumbar total disc replacement.
Siskey R; Peck J; Mehta H; Kosydar A; Kurtz S; Hill G
Spine J; 2016 Sep; 16(9):1133-42. PubMed ID: 27179625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are PEEK-on-Ceramic Bearings an Option for Total Disc Arthroplasty? An In Vitro Tribology Study.
Siskey R; Ciccarelli L; Lui MK; Kurtz SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2428-2440. PubMed ID: 27677290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. UHMWPE wear debris and tissue reactions are reduced for contemporary designs of lumbar total disc replacements.
Veruva SY; Lanman TH; Isaza JE; MacDonald DW; Kurtz SM; Steinbeck MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):987-98. PubMed ID: 25367112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients.
David T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 17413471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Periprosthetic UHMWPE Wear Debris Induces Inflammation, Vascularization, and Innervation After Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine.
Veruva SY; Lanman TH; Isaza JE; Freeman TA; Kurtz SM; Steinbeck MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May; 475(5):1369-1381. PubMed ID: 27488379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical, radiological, histological and retrieval findings of Activ-L and Mobidisc total disc replacements: a study of two patients.
Austen S; Punt IM; Cleutjens JP; Willems PC; Kurtz SM; MacDonald DW; van Rhijn LW; van Ooij A
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S513-20. PubMed ID: 22245852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posterior component impingement after lumbar total disc replacement: a radiographic analysis of 66 ProDisc-L prostheses in 56 patients.
Käfer W; Clessienne CB; Däxle M; Kocak T; Reichel H; Cakir B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2444-9. PubMed ID: 18923322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement.
Wagner WH; Regan JJ; Leary SP; Lanman TH; Johnson JP; Rao RK; Cossman DV
J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17145428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision of a Charité artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charité artificial disc: case report and explant analysis.
David T
Eur Spine J; 2005 Jun; 14(5):507-11. PubMed ID: 15672241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Severe impingement of lumbar disc replacements increases the functional biological activity of polyethylene wear debris.
Baxter RM; Macdonald DW; Kurtz SM; Steinbeck MJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e751-9. PubMed ID: 23780545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing subsidence risk by using rapid manufactured patient-specific intervertebral disc implants.
de Beer N; Scheffer C
Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1060-6. PubMed ID: 23103407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc.
van Ooij A; Oner FC; Verbout AJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug; 16(4):369-83. PubMed ID: 12902953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
