BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17197335)

  • 1. In vitro measurement of pressure differences using manometry at various injection speeds during discography.
    Seo KS; Derby R; Date ES; Lee SH; Kim BJ; Lee CH
    Spine J; 2007; 7(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 17197335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro measurement of pressure in intervertebral discs and annulus fibrosus with and without annular tears during discography.
    Lee SH; Derby R; Chen Y; Seo KS; Kim MJ
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6):614-8. PubMed ID: 15541691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors influencing manometric pressure during pressure-controlled discography.
    Shin DA; Kim SH; Han IB; Rhim SC; Kim HI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E790-3. PubMed ID: 19829241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysical measurements during lumbar discography: a heart rate response study.
    Stojanovic MP; Cheng J; Larkin TM; Cohen SP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 17607105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intradiscal pressure monitoring in the cervical spine.
    Menkowitz M; Stieber JR; Wenokor C; Cohen JD; Donald GD; Cresanti-Dakinis C
    Pain Physician; 2005 Apr; 8(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 16850070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A gold standard evaluation of the "discogenic pain" diagnosis as determined by provocative discography.
    Carragee EJ; Lincoln T; Parmar VS; Alamin T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(18):2115-23. PubMed ID: 16915099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward more useful pressure-controlled discography: in vitro evaluation of injection speed, sensor location, and tube length.
    Choi WS; Shin DA; Kim HI; Lee SH; Derby R; Lee SH; Kim HJ
    Pain Med; 2011 Jan; 12(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 21087408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pressure-controlled lumbar discography in volunteers without low back symptoms.
    Derby R; Lee SH; Kim BJ; Chen Y; Aprill C; Bogduk N
    Pain Med; 2005; 6(3):213-21; discussion 222-4. PubMed ID: 15972084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biomechanical assessment of disc pressures in the lumbosacral spine in response to external unloading forces.
    Ferrara L; Triano JJ; Sohn MJ; Song E; Lee DD
    Spine J; 2005; 5(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 16153584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo discography in degenerate porcine spines revealed pressure transfer to adjacent discs.
    Hebelka H; Nilsson A; Ekström L; Hansson T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(25):E1575-82. PubMed ID: 24296483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a novel minimally invasive intervertebral disc pressure sensor utilizing in-fiber Bragg gratings in a porcine model: an ex vivo study.
    Dennison CR; Wild PM; Dvorak MF; Wilson DR; Cripton PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(17):E589-94. PubMed ID: 18670326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of uniform heating on the biomechanical properties of the intervertebral disc in a porcine model.
    Wang JC; Kabo JM; Tsou PM; Halevi L; Shamie AN
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 15653086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intradiscal injections of osteogenic protein-1 restore the viscoelastic properties of degenerated intervertebral discs.
    Miyamoto K; Masuda K; Kim JG; Inoue N; Akeda K; Andersson GB; An HS
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):692-703. PubMed ID: 17088200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 15. Discogenic low back pain.
    Kallewaard JW; Terheggen MA; Groen GJ; Sluijter ME; Derby R; Kapural L; Mekhail N; van Kleef M
    Pain Pract; 2010; 10(6):560-79. PubMed ID: 20825564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure Increase in Adjacent Discs During Clinical Discography Questions the Methods Validity.
    Hebelka H; Nilsson A; Hansson T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(11):893-899. PubMed ID: 24365908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The transfer of disc pressure to adjacent discs in discography: a specificity problem?
    Hebelka H; Gaulitz A; Nilsson A; Holm S; Hansson T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(20):E1025-9. PubMed ID: 20802394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intradiscal pressure changes with dynamic pedicle screw systems.
    Dath R; Sirkett DM; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 18525483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of central hypersensitivity in the determination of intradiscal mechanical hyperalgesia in discogenic pain.
    Schliessbach J; Arendt-Nielsen L; Heini P; Curatolo M
    Pain Med; 2010 May; 11(5):701-8. PubMed ID: 20546512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative discomanometry: technique and reproducibility in vitro.
    Fye MA; Southern EP; Panjabi MM; Cholewicki J
    J Spinal Disord; 1998 Aug; 11(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 9726304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of discographic findings in asymptomatic subject discs and the negative discs of chronic LBP patients: can discography distinguish asymptomatic discs among morphologically abnormal discs?
    Derby R; Kim BJ; Lee SH; Chen Y; Seo KS; Aprill C
    Spine J; 2005; 5(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 15996608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.