These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17197465)
1. Performance of the PAxpress vs the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway during general anesthesia. Lallo A; Drolet P; Lacroix M Can J Anaesth; 2007 Jan; 54(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 17197465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the laryngeal tube-S and Proseal laryngeal mask during outpatient surgical procedures. Zand F; Amini A; Sadeghi SE; Gureishi M; Chohedri A Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):847-51. PubMed ID: 17608965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized prospective study comparing the laryngeal tube suction II with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed patients. Kikuchi T; Kamiya Y; Ohtsuka T; Miki T; Goto T Anesthesiology; 2008 Jul; 109(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18580172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The PAxpress is an effective ventilatory device but has an 18% failure rate for flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation in anesthetized paralyzed patients. Dimitriou V; Voyagis GS; Iatrou C; Brimacombe J Can J Anaesth; 2003 May; 50(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 12734160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. Shin WJ; Cheong YS; Yang HS; Nishiyama T Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):598-601. PubMed ID: 19915475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The applicability of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for laparotomies]. Borkowski A; Perl T; Heuer J; Timmermann A; Braun U Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2005 Aug; 40(8):477-86. PubMed ID: 16078158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [An auto control comparison of the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and standard laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation]. Li CW; Xue FS; Mao P; Xu YC; Liu Y; Zhang GH; Liu KP; Sun HT Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 19(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 17326908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study. Tham HM; Tan SM; Woon KL; Zhao YD Can J Anaesth; 2010 Jul; 57(7):672-8. PubMed ID: 20411444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more successful with the 90 degrees rotation technique. Jeon YT; Na HS; Park SH; Oh AY; Park HP; Yun MJ; Kim JH; Hwang JW Can J Anaesth; 2010 Mar; 57(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 20077171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of the Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Proseal laryngeal Mask Airway in anesthetized patients]. Ueno M; Suzuki A; Takahata O; Iwasaki H Masui; 2008 Sep; 57(9):1131-5. PubMed ID: 18807900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiovascular changes after extraglottic airway insertion: a prospective, randomized comparison between the laryngeal mask or the new PAXpress. Casati A; Vinciguerra F; Spreafico E; Marchetti C; Putzu M; Siliotti R; Mondello E J Clin Anesth; 2004 Aug; 16(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 15374554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the modified Airway Management Device with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing gynaecological procedures. Pay LL; Lim Y Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Jan; 23(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 16390570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of LMA Unique, Ambu laryngeal mask and Soft Seal laryngeal mask during routine surgical procedures. Francksen H; Bein B; Cavus E; Renner J; Scholz J; Steinfath M; Tonner PH; Doerges V Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Feb; 24(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 16895620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laryngeal tube S II, ProSeal laryngeal mask, and EasyTube during elective surgery: a randomized controlled comparison with the endotracheal tube in nontrained professionals. Cavus E; Deitmer W; Francksen H; Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Doerges V Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Sep; 26(9):730-5. PubMed ID: 19373095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of laryngeal tube with laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized and paralysed patients. Yildiz TS; Solak M; Toker K Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Jul; 24(7):620-5. PubMed ID: 17376250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)- Proseal and the LMA-Classic in ventilated children receiving neuromuscular blockade. Lardner DR; Cox RG; Ewen A; Dickinson D Can J Anaesth; 2008 Jan; 55(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18166745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway. López-Gil M; Mantilla I; Blanco T; Teigell E; Hervias M; Fernández-López R Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 22295870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved esophageal patency when inserting the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with an Eschmann tracheal tube introducer. El Beheiry H; Wong J; Nair G; Chinnappa V; Arora G; Morales E; Chung F Can J Anaesth; 2009 Oct; 56(10):725-32. PubMed ID: 19603240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the laryngeal mask (LMA) and laryngeal tube (LT) with the new perilaryngeal airway (CobraPLA) in short surgical procedures. Turan A; Kaya G; Koyuncu O; Karamanlioglu B; Pamukçu Z Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Mar; 23(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 16430795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]