27 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17197540)
1. Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression.
Gardiner SK; Crabb DP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2002 May; 86(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 11973255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of visual field progression in glaucoma: existing methods and artificial intelligence.
Asaoka R; Murata H
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2023 Sep; 67(5):546-559. PubMed ID: 37540325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved Detection of Visual Field Progression Using a Spatiotemporal Boundary Detection Method.
Berchuck SI; Mwanza JC; Tanna AP; Budenz DL; Warren JL
Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4642. PubMed ID: 30874616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhancement of Visual Field Predictions with Pointwise Exponential Regression (PER) and Pointwise Linear Regression (PLR).
Morales E; de Leon JM; Abdollahi N; Yu F; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Caprioli J
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 5(2):12. PubMed ID: 26998405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of regression models for serial visual field analysis.
Lee JM; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Morales E; Afifi A; Yu F; Caprioli J
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 58(6):504-14. PubMed ID: 25163892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of glaucomatous visual field progression: pointwise analysis.
Shon K; Wollstein G; Schuman JS; Sung KR
Curr Eye Res; 2014 Jul; 39(7):705-10. PubMed ID: 24892993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting changes in retinal function: Analysis with Non-Stationary Weibull Error Regression and Spatial enhancement (ANSWERS).
Zhu H; Russell RA; Saunders LJ; Ceccon S; Garway-Heath DF; Crabb DP
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85654. PubMed ID: 24465636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and validation of an improved neurological hemifield test to identify chiasmal and postchiasmal lesions by automated perimetry.
McCoy AN; Quigley HA; Wang J; Miller NR; Subramanian PS; Ramulu PY; Boland MV
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Feb; 55(2):1017-23. PubMed ID: 24448263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of test variability on the structure-function relationship in early glaucoma.
Gardiner SK; Johnson CA; Demirel S
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Dec; 250(12):1851-61. PubMed ID: 22527311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of visual field progression in glaucoma with standard achromatic perimetry: a review and practical implications.
Nouri-Mahdavi K; Nassiri N; Giangiacomo A; Caprioli J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 249(11):1593-616. PubMed ID: 21870086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer thickness loss with optical coherence tomography using 4 criteria for functional progression.
Grewal DS; Sehi M; Paauw JD; Greenfield DS;
J Glaucoma; 2012; 21(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 21654510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of change in visual field on health-related quality of life the los angeles latino eye study.
Patino CM; Varma R; Azen SP; Conti DV; Nichol MB; McKean-Cowdin R;
Ophthalmology; 2011 Jul; 118(7):1310-7. PubMed ID: 21458074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perimetric indices as predictors of future glaucomatous functional change.
Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Johnson CA
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jan; 88(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 20966804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monitoring glaucomatous visual field progression: the effect of a novel spatial filter.
Strouthidis NG; Scott A; Viswanathan AC; Crabb DP; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 48(1):251-7. PubMed ID: 17197540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement.
Strouthidis NG; Scott A; Peter NM; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 47(7):2904-10. PubMed ID: 16799032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis.
Fayers T; Strouthidis NG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1973-80. PubMed ID: 17662455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of methods used to determine the progression of visual field defects in glaucoma.
Mayama C; Araie M; Suzuki Y; Ishida K; Yamamoto T; Kitazawa Y; Shirakashi M; Abe H; Tsukamoto H; Mishima HK; Yoshimura K; Ohashi Y
Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2117-25. PubMed ID: 15522380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Heidelberg retina tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score: reproducibility and measurement of progression.
Strouthidis NG; Demirel S; Asaoka R; Cossio-Zuniga C; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):724-9. PubMed ID: 20045564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study.
Nouri-Mahdavi K; Hoffman D; Coleman AL; Liu G; Li G; Gaasterland D; Caprioli J;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1627-35. PubMed ID: 15350314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
