380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17197583)
1. Laparoscopic occlusion compared with embolization of uterine vessels: a randomized controlled trial.
Hald K; Kløw NE; Qvigstad E; Istre O
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 109(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 17197583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic occlusion of uterine arteries for leiomyomas: long-term results of a randomized comparative trial.
Hald K; Noreng HJ; Istre O; Kløw NE
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1303-10; quiz 1311. PubMed ID: 19713130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uterine artery embolization as a treatment option for uterine myomas.
Marshburn PB; Matthews ML; Hurst BS
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 33(1):125-44. PubMed ID: 16504811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical application and midterm results of laparoscopic partial resection of symptomatic adenomyosis combined with uterine artery occlusion.
Kang L; Gong J; Cheng Z; Dai H; Liping H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 19249704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No morphine sparing effect of ketamine added to morphine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after uterine artery embolization.
Jensen LL; Handberg G; Helbo-Hansen HS; Skaarup I; Lohse T; Munk T; Lund N
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2008 Apr; 52(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 18339153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective data collection of a new procedure by a specialty society: the FIBROID registry.
Myers ER; Goodwin S; Landow W; Mauro M; Peterson E; Pron G; Spies JB; Worthington-Kirsch R;
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 15994616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term outcome of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.
Lohle PN; Voogt MJ; De Vries J; Smeets AJ; Vervest HA; Lampmann LE; Boekkooi PF
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Mar; 19(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 18295689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine fibroid embolization versus myomectomy in women wishing to preserve fertility: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial.
Mara M; Fucikova Z; Maskova J; Kuzel D; Haakova L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 16293363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis with or without uterine leiomyomas with the use of calibrated tris-acryl gelatin microspheres: midterm clinical and MR imaging follow-up.
Lohle PN; De Vries J; Klazen CA; Boekkooi PF; Vervest HA; Smeets AJ; Lampmann LE; Kroencke TJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Jul; 18(7):835-41. PubMed ID: 17609441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic occlusion of uterine vessels for the treatment of symptomatic fibroids: Initial experience and comparison to uterine artery embolization.
Hald K; Langebrekke A; Kløw NE; Noreng HJ; Berge AB; Istre O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 14749632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uterine artery embolization versus occlusion for uterine leiomyomas: a pilot randomized clinical trial.
Cunningham E; Barreda L; Ngo M; Terasaki K; Munro MG
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 18439501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Influential factors to therapeutic efficacy of uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine fibroids].
Zhou SK; Li SB; Zhang ZS
Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 Aug; 28(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 14653133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The FIBROID Registry: symptom and quality-of-life status 1 year after therapy.
Spies JB; Myers ER; Worthington-Kirsch R; Mulgund J; Goodwin S; Mauro M;
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 106(6):1309-18. PubMed ID: 16319257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limited uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres: 1-year follow-up.
Lohle PN; Boekkooi FP; Smeets AJ; Pieters JJ; Vervest HA; Lampmann LE; Sluzewski M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Feb; 17(2 Pt 1):283-7. PubMed ID: 16517773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Transarterial embolization for uterine fibroids: clinical success rate and results of magnetic resonance imaging].
Kröncke TJ; Gauruder-Burmester A; Scheurig C; Gronewold M; Klüner C; Fischer T; Klessen C; Rudolph J; Siara K; Zimmermann E; Hamm B
Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 15657826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Percutaneous treatment of uterine fibroleiomyomas: analysis of complications and quality of life after embolization].
Salerno S; Belli AM
Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 11438788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Treatment of uterine fibromyoma with bilateral uterine artery embolization: state of the art].
Lupattelli T; Clerissi J; Basile A; Minnella DP; Donati Sarti R; Gerli S; Di Renzo G
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):427-39. PubMed ID: 17923833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uterine-artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Edwards RD; Moss JG; Lumsden MA; Wu O; Murray LS; Twaddle S; Murray GD;
N Engl J Med; 2007 Jan; 356(4):360-70. PubMed ID: 17251532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term efficacy and safety of uterine artery embolization in young patients with and without uteroovarian anastomoses.
Kim HS; Paxton BE; Lee JM
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Feb; 19(2 Pt 1):195-200. PubMed ID: 18341948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for fibromyomata: uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic myomectomy.
Goldberg J; Pereira L; Berghella V; Diamond J; Daraï E; Seinera P; Seracchioli R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 15295339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
