BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17197795)

  • 1. Patients' and surrogates' perspective on research and testing in critical care.
    Rubulotta F
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):328; author reply 328-9. PubMed ID: 17197795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surrogate consent for genomics research in intensive care.
    Shelton AK; Fish AF; Cobb JP; Bachman JA; Jenkins RL; Battistich V; Freeman BD
    Am J Crit Care; 2009 Sep; 18(5):418-26; quiz 427. PubMed ID: 19723862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic research and testing in critical care: surrogates' perspective.
    Freeman BD; Kennedy CR; Coopersmith CM; Zehnbauer BA; Buchman TG
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Apr; 34(4):986-94. PubMed ID: 16484903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Substitute decisions about genetic testing in critical care research: a glimpse behind the curtain.
    Lavery JV; Slutsky AS
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Apr; 34(4):1257-9. PubMed ID: 16550080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic research into Alzheimer's disease: a European focus group study on ethical issues.
    van der Vorm A; Rikkert MO; Vernooij-Dassen M; Dekkers W;
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2008 Jan; 23(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17477450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surrogate receptivity to participation in critical illness genetic research: aligning research oversight and stakeholder concerns.
    Freeman BD; Butler K; Bolcic-Jankovic D; Clarridge BR; Kennedy CR; LeBlanc J; Chandros Hull S
    Chest; 2015 Apr; 147(4):979-988. PubMed ID: 25340645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent for genetic research involving pleiotropic genes: an empirical study of ApoE research.
    Cooper ZN; Nelson RM; Ross LF
    IRB; 2006; 28(5):1-11. PubMed ID: 17152129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deferred proxy consent in emergency critical care research: ethically valid and practically feasible.
    Jansen TC; Kompanje EJ; Bakker J
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1 Suppl):S65-8. PubMed ID: 19104227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Reactions to genetic testing].
    Boman H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 May; 119(13):1867. PubMed ID: 10382327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attitudes regarding predictive testing for retinitis pigmentosa.
    Mezer E; Babul-Hirji R; Wise R; Chipman M; DaSilva L; Rowell M; Thackray R; Shuman CT; Levin AV
    Ophthalmic Genet; 2007 Mar; 28(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 17454742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invited comments on the Shostak and Ottman review.
    Conrad P
    Epilepsia; 2006 Oct; 47(10):1749-50; author reply 1755-6. PubMed ID: 17054703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Theory of Genetic Vulnerability: a Roy model exemplar.
    Hamilton RJ; Bowers BJ
    Nurs Sci Q; 2007 Jul; 20(3):254-64. PubMed ID: 17595406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of sleep assessment tools by nurses and patients in critical care.
    Richardson A; Crow W; Coghill E; Turnock C
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Sep; 16(9):1660-8. PubMed ID: 17459137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Delirium as destiny: clinical precision and genetic risk.
    Skrobik Y
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):304-5. PubMed ID: 17197776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative research methodology in the exploration of patients' perceptions of participating in a genetic research program.
    Basson F; Futter MJ; Greenberg J
    Ophthalmic Genet; 2007 Sep; 28(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 17896312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic testing for everyone.
    Pearson H
    Nature; 2008 May; 453(7195):570-1. PubMed ID: 18509402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anticipating clinical integration of pharmacogenetic treatment strategies for addiction: are primary care physicians ready?
    Shields AE; Lerman C
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Apr; 83(4):635-9. PubMed ID: 18323859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surrogates have not been shown to make inaccurate substituted judgments.
    Broström L; Johansson M
    J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 19845202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When surrogates' responsibilities and religious concerns intersect.
    Berger JT
    J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(4):391-3. PubMed ID: 18321001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Autonomy and the family as (in)appropriate surrogates for DNR decisions: a qualitative analysis of dying cancer patients' talk.
    Eliott J; Olver I
    J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(3):206-18. PubMed ID: 18051937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.