376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17197900)
1. Utility of p16INK4a, CEA, Ki67, P53 and ER/PR in the differential diagnosis of benign, premalignant, and malignant glandular lesions of the uterine cervix and their relationship with Silverberg scoring system for endocervical glandular lesions.
Liang J; Mittal KR; Wei JJ; Yee H; Chiriboga L; Shukla P
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2007 Jan; 26(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 17197900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, and p53 in the differential diagnosis of glandular lesions of the cervix.
Cina SJ; Richardson MS; Austin RM; Kurman RJ
Mod Pathol; 1997 Mar; 10(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 9071723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endocervical glandular lesions: a diagnostic approach combining a semi-quantitative scoring method to the expression of CEA, MIB-1 and p16.
Pavlakis K; Messini I; Athanassiadou S; Kyrodimou E; Pandazopoulou A; Vrekoussis T; Stathopoulos EN
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):971-6. PubMed ID: 16876235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ancillary p16(INK4a) adds no meaningful value to the performance of ER/PR/Vim/CEA panel in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
Yao CC; Kok LF; Lee MY; Wang PH; Wu TS; Tyan YS; Cheng YW; Kung MF; Han CP
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 19153755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of p16ink4a, ProEX C, and Ki-67 for the diagnosis of glandular dysplasia and adenocarcinoma of the cervix uteri.
Negri G; Bellisano G; Carico E; Faa G; Kasal A; Antoniazzi S; Egarter-Vigl E; Piccin A; Dalla Palma P; Vittadello F
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Jul; 30(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 21623205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abnormal expression of sex steroid receptors and cell cycle-related molecules in adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Lu X; Shiozawa T; Nakayama K; Toki T; Nikaido T; Fujii S
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1999 Apr; 18(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10202666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The utility of PAX8 and IMP3 immunohistochemical stains in the differential diagnosis of benign, premalignant, and malignant endocervical glandular lesions.
Danialan R; Assaad M; Burghardt J; Newcomb P; Cartun RW; Mandavilli S
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Aug; 130(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 23618832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. P16 and Ki67 immunostaining is a useful adjunct in the assessment of biopsies for HPV-associated anal intraepithelial neoplasia.
Walts AE; Lechago J; Bose S
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 16819320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adding the p16(INK4a) marker to the traditional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel engenders no supplemental benefit in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
Han CP; Lee MY; Kok LF; Ruan A; Wu TS; Cheng YW; Tyan YS; Lin CY
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2009 Sep; 28(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 19696622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of p16 expression for distinction of uterine serous carcinomas from endometrial endometrioid and endocervical adenocarcinomas: immunohistochemical analysis of 201 cases.
Yemelyanova A; Ji H; Shih IeM; Wang TL; Wu LS; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Oct; 33(10):1504-14. PubMed ID: 19623034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ki67 labelling index and p53 status indicate neoplastic nature of atypical lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (ALEGH).
Mikami Y; Kojima A; Kiyokawa T; Manabe T
Histopathology; 2009 Sep; 55(3):362-4. PubMed ID: 19723155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnosis problems in a case of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Simionescu C; Georgescu CV; Mărgăritescu C; Niculescu M
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2006; 47(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 17308683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PAX2 distinguishes benign mesonephric and mullerian glandular lesions of the cervix from endocervical adenocarcinoma, including minimal deviation adenocarcinoma.
Rabban JT; McAlhany S; Lerwill MF; Grenert JP; Zaloudek CJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Feb; 34(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 20061933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas: is a 2-marker (Vim/CEA) panel enough?
Liao CL; Hsu JD; Lee MY; Kok LF; Li YJ; Wang PH; Yao CC; Han CP
Virchows Arch; 2010 Apr; 456(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 20221633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intestinal-type cervical adenocarcinoma in situ and adenocarcinoma exhibit a partial enteric immunophenotype with consistent expression of CDX2.
McCluggage WG; Shah R; Connolly LE; McBride HA
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2008 Jan; 27(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 18156982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endocervical adenocarcinomas with prominent endometrial or endomyometrial involvement simulating primary endometrial carcinomas: utility of HPV DNA detection and immunohistochemical expression of p16 and hormone receptors to confirm the cervical origin of the corpus tumor.
Yemelyanova A; Vang R; Seidman JD; Gravitt PE; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jun; 33(6):914-24. PubMed ID: 19295407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distinctive immunohistochemical profile of penile intraepithelial lesions: a study of 74 cases.
Chaux A; Pfannl R; Rodríguez IM; Barreto JE; Velazquez EF; Lezcano C; Piris A; Netto GJ; Cubilla AL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Apr; 35(4):553-62. PubMed ID: 21399489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Expression of retinoic acid receptor-beta mRNA and p16, p53, Ki67 proteins in esophageal carcinoma and its precursor lesions].
Huang H; Wang LF; Tian HM; Liu Y; Li M; Qu P; Wang WR; Zhang W
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 27(3):152-5. PubMed ID: 15946564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tissue-based Immunohistochemical Biomarker Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Glandular Lesions of the Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.
Lee S; Rose MS; Sahasrabuddhe VV; Zhao R; Duggan MA
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2017 Jul; 36(4):310-322. PubMed ID: 27801764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A reappraisal of three-marker (ER/Vim/CEA), four-marker (ER/Vim/CEA/PR), and five-marker (ER/Vim/CEA/PR/p16INK4a) panels in the diagnostic distinction between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
Han CP; Lee MY; Kok LF; Wu TS; Cheng YW; Wang PH; Yue CH; Tyan YS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 May; 281(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 19847454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
