BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17198018)

  • 1. Endothelial cell density in donor corneas: a comparison of automatic software programs with manual counting.
    Hirneiss C; Schumann RG; Grüterich M; Welge-Luessen UC; Kampik A; Neubauer AS
    Cornea; 2007 Jan; 26(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 17198018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of endothelial assessment during corneal organ culture: comparison of a computer-assisted analyzer with manual methods.
    Deb-Joardar N; Thuret G; Gavet Y; Acquart S; Garraud O; Egelhoffer H; Gain P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2062-7. PubMed ID: 17460261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Manual endothelial cell enumeration for transplanted corneas in comparison to software controlled, automatic enumeration].
    Kohlhof JK; Ruprecht KW
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Jun; 221(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 15236107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two semiautomated methods for evaluating endothelial cells of eye bank corneas.
    Deb-Joardar N; Thuret G; Zhao M; Acquart S; Péoc'h M; Garraud O; Gain P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 48(7):3077-82. PubMed ID: 17591876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of repeatability for the automatic estimation of endothelial cell density in donor corneas.
    Ruggeri A; Grisan E; Schroeter J
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Sep; 91(9):1213-5. PubMed ID: 17431018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Automated analyser of organ cultured corneal endothelial mosaic].
    Gain P; Thuret G; Chiquet C; Gavet Y; Turc PH; Théillère C; Acquart S; Le Petit JC; Maugery J; Campos L
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2002 May; 25(5):462-72. PubMed ID: 12048509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo confocal microscopy of the corneal endothelium: comparison of three morphometry methods after corneal transplantation.
    Jonuscheit S; Doughty MJ; Ramaesh K
    Eye (Lond); 2011 Sep; 25(9):1130-7. PubMed ID: 21660067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endothelial morphometry by image analysis of corneas organ cultured at 31 degrees C.
    Acquart S; Gain P; Zhao M; Gavet Y; Defreyn A; Piselli S; Garraud O; Thuret G
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Mar; 51(3):1356-64. PubMed ID: 19850847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Endothelial keratopathy in pseudoexfoliation syndrome: quantitative and qualitative morphometry using automated video image analysis].
    Seitz B; Müller EE; Langenbucher A; Kus MM; Naumann GO
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Sep; 207(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 7474785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endothelial keratoplasty: the influence of preoperative donor endothelial cell densities on dislocation, primary graft failure, and 1-year cell counts.
    Terry MA; Shamie N; Chen ES; Hoar KL; Phillips PM; Friend DJ
    Cornea; 2008 Dec; 27(10):1131-7. PubMed ID: 19034127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of endothelial cell density of organ cultured corneas with cornea donor study.
    Campolmi N; He Z; Acquart S; Trone MC; Bernard A; Gauthier AS; Garraud O; Forest F; Péocʼh M; Gain P; Thuret G
    Cornea; 2014 Jun; 33(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 24809309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new system for the automatic estimation of endothelial cell density in donor corneas.
    Ruggeri A; Grisan E; Jaroszewski J
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Mar; 89(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 15722310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of growth factors on morphometric corneal endothelial cell parameters and cell density in culture-preserved human corneas.
    Barisani-Asenbauer T; Kaminski S; Schuster E; Dietrich A; Biowski R; Lukas J; Gosch-Baumgartner I
    Cornea; 1997 Sep; 16(5):537-40. PubMed ID: 9294685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standard microlithographic mosaics to assess endothelial cell counting methods by light microscopy in eye banks using organ culture.
    Deb-Joardar N; Thuret G; Racine GA; Pons D; Brun G; Parriaux O; Peoc'h M; Acquart S; Gain P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 47(10):4373-7. PubMed ID: 17003428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of flex-center, center, and corner methods of corneal endothelial cell analysis.
    Patel SV; McLaren JW; Bachman LA; Bourne WM
    Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1042-7. PubMed ID: 20520534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endothelial keratoplasty using donor tissue not suitable for full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty.
    Armour RL; Ousley PJ; Wall J; Hoar K; Stoeger C; Terry MA
    Cornea; 2007 Jun; 26(5):515-9. PubMed ID: 17525642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endothelial cell loss after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend.
    Price MO; Price FW
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 17868873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of image quality and accuracy of eye bank measurement of donor cornea endothelial cell density in the Specular Microscopy Ancillary Study.
    Lass JH; Gal RL; Ruedy KJ; Benetz BA; Beck RW; Baratz KH; Holland EJ; Kalajian A; Kollman C; Manning FJ; Mannis MJ; McCoy K; Montoya M; Stulting D; Xing D;
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Mar; 112(3):431-40. PubMed ID: 15745770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Major endothelial loss from corneas in organ culture: importance of second endothelial count.
    Builles N; Kodjikian L; Burillon C; Damour O
    Cornea; 2006 Aug; 25(7):815-20. PubMed ID: 17068459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Endothelial evaluation of corneal transplants by digital imaging].
    Reinhard T; Spelsberg H; Holzwarth D; Dahmen N; Godehardt E; Sundmacher R
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Jun; 214(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 10427545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.