259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17198283)
1. Rejuvenating a foundering institutional review board: one institution's story.
De Ville K; Hassler G; Lewis MJ
Acad Med; 2007 Jan; 82(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 17198283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Searching for an efficient institutional review board review model: Interrelationship of trainee-investigators, funding, and initial approval.
Dominguez RA; Feaster DJ; Twiggs LB; Altman NH
J Lab Clin Med; 2005 Feb; 145(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 15746648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical education research and IRB review: an analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions.
Dyrbye LN; Thomas MR; Mechaber AJ; Eacker A; Harper W; Massie FS; Power DV; Shanafelt TD
Acad Med; 2007 Jul; 82(7):654-60. PubMed ID: 17595560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol.
Mansbach J; Acholonu U; Clark S; Camargo CA
Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 14(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 17312334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concept paper: a virtual centralized IRB system.
McWilliams R; Hebden CW; Gilpin AM
Account Res; 2006; 13(1):25-45. PubMed ID: 16770858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
Bramstedt KA; Kassimatis K
Clin Invest Med; 2004 Dec; 27(6):316-23. PubMed ID: 15675112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board: lessons learned from developing a multicenter regional institutional review board.
Saginur R; Dent SF; Schwartz L; Heslegrave R; Stacey S; Manzo J
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(9):1479-82. PubMed ID: 18349399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional review board consideration of chart reviews, case reports, and observational studies.
Neff MJ
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1350-3. PubMed ID: 18811999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinician educators' experiences with institutional review boards: results of a national survey.
Dyrbye LN; Thomas MR; Papp KK; Durning SJ
Acad Med; 2008 Jun; 83(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 18520468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Establishing procedures for institutional oversight of stem cell research.
Zettler P; Wolf LE; Lo B
Acad Med; 2007 Jan; 82(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 17198282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical and institutional review board issues.
Skolnick BE
Adv Neurol; 1998; 76():253-62. PubMed ID: 9408484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress II: principles and recommendations for oversight of an institution's financial interests in human subjects research.
AAMC Task Force on Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research
Acad Med; 2003 Feb; 78(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 12584107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should society allow research ethics boards to be run as for-profit enterprises?
Emanuel EJ; Lemmens T; Elliot C
PLoS Med; 2006 Jul; 3(7):e309. PubMed ID: 16848618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practice-based research network studies and institutional review boards: two new issues.
Yawn BP; Graham DG; Bertram SL; Kurland MJ; Dietrich AJ; Wollan PC; Brandt EC; Huff JM; Pace WD
J Am Board Fam Med; 2009; 22(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 19587261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anonymous self-evaluation of performance by ethics board members: a pilot study.
Feldman JA; Rebholz CM
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Mar; 4(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 19382879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protection of human subjects: categories of research that may be reviewed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) through an expedited review procedure--FDA. Notice.
Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(216 Pt 1):60353-6. PubMed ID: 10187395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting of ethical review of clinical research submitted to the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Perkins AC; Choi JM; Kimball AB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 56(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 17224370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New challenges facing interinstitutional social science and educational program evaluation research at academic health centers: a case study from the ELAM program.
Morahan PS; Yamagata H; McDade SA; Richman R; Francis R; Odhner VC
Acad Med; 2006 Jun; 81(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 16728800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An education initiative to increase staff knowledge of Institutional Review Board guidelines in the USA.
Kotzer AM; Milton J
Nurs Health Sci; 2007 Jun; 9(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 17470183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancing communication among data monitoring committees and institutional review boards.
Taylor HA; Chaisson L; Sugarman J
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18559418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
