392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17199614)
21. AmpFlSTR profiler Plus short tandem repeat DNA analysis of casework samples, mixture samples, and nonhuman DNA samples amplified under reduced PCR volume conditions (25 microL).
Frégeau CJ; Bowen KL; Leclair B; Trudel I; Bishop L; Fourney RM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1014-34. PubMed ID: 14535664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Examination of the variability in mixed DNA profile parameters for the Identifiler multiplex.
Bright JA; Turkington J; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 20129469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. My-Forensic-Loci-queries (MyFLq) framework for analysis of forensic STR data generated by massive parallel sequencing.
Van Neste C; Vandewoestyne M; Van Criekinge W; Deforce D; Van Nieuwerburgh F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():1-8. PubMed ID: 24528572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.
Curran JM; Gill P; Bill MR
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15607589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tri-allelic SNP markers enable analysis of mixed and degraded DNA samples.
Westen AA; Matai AS; Laros JF; Meiland HC; Jasper M; de Leeuw WJ; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 19647708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of PowerPlex 16, PowerPlex1.1/2.1, and ABI AmpfISTR Profiler Plus/COfiler for forensic use.
Tomsey CS; Kurtz M; Kist F; Hockensmith M; Call P
Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 11387630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation study of the TrueAllele automated data review system.
Kadash K; Kozlowski BE; Biega LA; Duceman BW
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jul; 49(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 15317179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Forensic interpretation of Y-chromosomal DNA mixtures.
Wolf A; Caliebe A; Junge O; Krawczak M
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 15978347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Expanding beyond the current core STR loci: An exploration of 73 STR markers with increased diversity for enhanced DNA mixture deconvolution.
Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; Woerner AE; Bus MM; Coble M; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():121-129. PubMed ID: 30396008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A forensic STR profiling system for the Eurasian badger: a framework for developing profiling systems for wildlife species.
Dawnay N; Ogden R; Thorpe RS; Pope LC; Dawson DA; McEwing R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 19083789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Internal validation of the AmpFlSTR Yfiler amplification kit for use in forensic casework.
Gross AM; Liberty AA; Ulland MM; Kuriger JK
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 18005009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A standard of AmpliType PM typing from aged evidentiary samples.
Mizuno N; Senju H; Sekiguchi K; Yoshida K; Kasai K; Sato H
J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):677-80. PubMed ID: 11373006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures.
Gill P; Brenner CH; Buckleton JS; Carracedo A; Krawczak M; Mayr WR; Morling N; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Weir BS;
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jul; 160(2-3):90-101. PubMed ID: 16750605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Systematic evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of sibship determination by using 15 STR loci.
Pu CE; Linacre A
J Forensic Leg Med; 2008 Jul; 15(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 18511010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Developmental validation of reduced-size STR Miniplex primer sets.
Opel KL; Chung DT; Drábek J; Butler JM; McCord BR
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Nov; 52(6):1263-71. PubMed ID: 18093061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
