These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17200825)

  • 21. Does the wear resistance of packable composite equal that of dental amalgam?
    Suzuki S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(6):355-65; discussion 365-7. PubMed ID: 15801341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins.
    Chen HY; Manhart J; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11257299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relative wear of flowable and highly filled composite.
    Clelland NL; Pagnotto MP; Kerby RE; Seghi RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 15674226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro evaluation of the wear resistance of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM.
    Lauvahutanon S; Takahashi H; Oki M; Arksornnukit M; Kanehira M; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 26235715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of wear between occlusal splint materials and resin composite materials.
    Reyes-Sevilla M; Kuijs RH; Werner A; Kleverlaan CJ; Lobbezoo F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 45(7):539-544. PubMed ID: 29663496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surface roughness of flowable and packable composite resin materials after finishing with abrasive discs.
    Uçtaşli MB; Bala O; Güllü A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Dec; 31(12):1197-202. PubMed ID: 15544656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
    Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of Wear Properties of Four Bulk-Fill Composites: Attrition, Erosion, and Abrasion.
    Asadian F; Shahidi Z; Moradi Z
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():8649616. PubMed ID: 34805405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contact- and contact-free wear between various resin composites.
    Osiewicz MA; Werner A; Pytko-Polonczyk J; Roeters FJ; Kleverlaan CJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 25498520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites.
    Watanabe H; Khera SC; Vargas MA; Qian F
    Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):418-25. PubMed ID: 17697707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I: in vitro investigations.
    Frankenberger R; García-Godoy F; Lohbauer U; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15810477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical wear rate of direct and indirect posterior composite resin restorations.
    Cetin AR; Unlu N
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Jun; 32(3):e87-94. PubMed ID: 22408783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Two- and three-body wear of composite resins.
    Koottathape N; Takahashi H; Iwasaki N; Kanehira M; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1261-70. PubMed ID: 23083806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Wear and fatigue behavior of nano-structured dental resin composites.
    Turssi CP; Ferracane JL; Ferracane LL
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2006 Jul; 78(1):196-203. PubMed ID: 16447169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surface roughness of various packable composites.
    Ryba TM; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 12022454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites.
    Marghalani HY
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 20433565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of variations in wear test methodology.
    Gouvêa CV; Weig K; Filho TR; Barros RN
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2010; 23(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 20645645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro attrition wear resistance of four types of paste-like bulk-fill composite resins.
    Asadian F; Hoseini AP; Ahmadian L; Rafeie N; Rezaei S; Moradi Z
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Aug; 22(1):360. PubMed ID: 35989324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.