These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17200825)

  • 41. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations.
    Belli R; Geinzer E; Muschweck A; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    Dent Mater; 2014 Apr; 30(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 24553249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of the wear and flexural characteristics of flowable resin composites for posterior lesions.
    Sumino N; Tsubota K; Takamizawa T; Shiratsuchi K; Miyazaki M; Latta MA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013; 71(3-4):820-7. PubMed ID: 23638859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dynamic viscoelastic behavior of dental composites measured by Split Hopkinson pressure bar.
    Tanimoto Y; Nishiwaki T; Nemoto K
    Dent Mater J; 2006 Jun; 25(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 16916223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Changes in gloss after simulated generalized wear of composite resins.
    Lee YK; Lu H; Oguri M; Powers JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):370-6. PubMed ID: 16198175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness.
    Mörmann WH; Stawarczyk B; Ender A; Sener B; Attin T; Mehl A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Apr; 20():113-25. PubMed ID: 23455168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material.
    Hahnel S; Behr M; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19328280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of cigarette smoke on color stability and surface roughness of dental composites.
    Alandia-Roman CC; Cruvinel DR; Sousa AB; Pires-de-Souza FC; Panzeri H
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41 Suppl 3():e73-9. PubMed ID: 23270748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Repairability of a packable resin-based composite using different adhesives.
    Dias WR; Ritter AV; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 12967072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Methacrylate- and silorane-based composite restorations: hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose.
    D'Alpino PH; Bechtold J; dos Santos PJ; Alonso RC; Di Hipólito V; Silikas N; Rodrigues FP
    Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1162-9. PubMed ID: 21925724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of 6 months of aging in water on hardness and surface roughness of two microhybrid dental composites.
    de Moraes RR; Marimon JL; Schneider LF; Sinhoreti MA; Correr-Sobrinho L; Bueno M
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 18266654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of Mechanical Loads and Surface Roughness on Wear of Silorane and Methacrylate-Based Posterior Composites.
    Tabatabaei MH; Arami S; Farahat F
    J Dent (Tehran); 2016 Nov; 13(6):407-414. PubMed ID: 28243302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure.
    Ferracane JL; Mitchem JC; Condon JR; Todd R
    J Dent Res; 1997 Aug; 76(8):1508-16. PubMed ID: 9240388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Localized and generalized simulated wear of resin composites.
    Barkmeier WW; Takamizawa T; Erickson RL; Tsujimoto A; Latta M; Miyazaki M
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(3):322-35. PubMed ID: 25706614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Wear simulation of resin composites and the relationship to clinical wear.
    Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Erickson RL; Wilwerding TM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 18435192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Hardness and wear resistance of two resin composites cured with equivalent radiant exposure from a low irradiance LED and QTH light-curing units.
    Ramp LC; Broome JC; Ramp MH
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16555655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion.
    Tanoue N; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 10898845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of high intensity vs. soft-start halogen irradiation on light-cured resin-based composites. Part II: Hardness and solubility.
    Hofmann N; Markert T; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 15241908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Comparison of wear resistance and flexural strength of three kinds of bulk-fill composite resins].
    Zhang H; Zhang ML; Qiu LH; Yu JT; Zhan FL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Jun; 25(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 27609380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Stain retention and surface characteristics of posterior composites polished by one-step systems.
    Türkün LS; Leblebicioğlu EA
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 17212075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.