These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17200827)

  • 1. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter.
    Kakaboura A; Fragouli M; Rahiotis C; Silikas N
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Jan; 18(1):155-63. PubMed ID: 17200827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites.
    Antonson SA; Yazici AR; Kilinc E; Antonson DE; Hardigan PC
    J Dent; 2011 Jul; 39 Suppl 1():e9-17. PubMed ID: 21256180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites.
    Da Costa J; Ferracane J; Paravina RD; Mazur RF; Roeder L
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6. PubMed ID: 17635330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
    Paravina RD; Roeder L; Lu H; Vogel K; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific surface roughness values for resin based materials.
    Grossman ES; Rosen M; Cleaton-Jones PE; Volchansky A
    SADJ; 2004 Aug; 59(7):274, 276, 278-9. PubMed ID: 15537027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems.
    Ergücü Z; Türkün LS
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 17427829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Ohmiti K; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):306-19. PubMed ID: 20036418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of polishing technique on 3-D surface roughness and gloss of dental restorative resin composites.
    Ereifej NS; Oweis YG; Eliades G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):E1-12. PubMed ID: 22917441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites.
    Lu H; Roeder LB; Powers JM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2003; 15(5):297-303; discussion 304. PubMed ID: 14620660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface properties of universal and flowable nanohybrid composites after simulated tooth brushing.
    Jin J; Takahashi R; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 25208363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface Roughness and Gloss of Actual Composites as Polished With Different Polishing Systems.
    Rodrigues-Junior SA; Chemin P; Piaia PP; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(4):418-29. PubMed ID: 25268040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of two surface analyzers to evaluate the surface roughness of four esthetic restorative materials after polishing.
    Joniot S; Salomon JP; Dejou J; Grégoire G
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16536192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface characteristics of resin composite materials after finishing and polishing.
    St Germain H; Samuelson BA
    Gen Dent; 2015; 63(2):26-32. PubMed ID: 25734283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
    Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface characterization of modern resin composites: a multitechnique approach.
    Silikas N; Kavvadia K; Eliades G; Watts D
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 15973826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.