These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17201558)

  • 21. Selection of macroreference frames in spatial memory.
    Kelly JW; Siegel ZD; Sjolund LA; Avraamides MN
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1278-1286. PubMed ID: 29931620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Social effects on reference frame selection.
    Kelly JW; Costabile KA; Cherep LA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2339-2345. PubMed ID: 29363061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Qualitative differences in memory for vista and environmental spaces are caused by opaque borders, not movement or successive presentation.
    Meilinger T; Strickrodt M; Bülthoff HH
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():77-95. PubMed ID: 27367592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No advantage for remembering horizontal over vertical spatial locations learned from a single viewpoint.
    Hinterecker T; Leroy C; Zhao M; Butz MV; Bülthoff HH; Meilinger T
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):158-171. PubMed ID: 28875474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Global frames of reference organize configural knowledge of paths.
    Mou W; McNamara TP; Zhang L
    Cognition; 2013 Oct; 129(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 23891827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Representations of interobject spatial relations in long-term memory.
    Rump B; McNamara TP
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 23007235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatial knowledge of geographical globes: evidence of vertical alignment effects.
    Tlauka M; Drummond A; Leffers J
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Aug; 99(Pt 3):395-411. PubMed ID: 17916281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Body- and environmental-stabilized processing of spatial knowledge.
    Mou W; Li X; McNamara TP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 18315416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Learning your way around town: how virtual taxicab drivers learn to use both layout and landmark information.
    Newman EL; Caplan JB; Kirschen MP; Korolev IO; Sekuler R; Kahana MJ
    Cognition; 2007 Aug; 104(2):231-53. PubMed ID: 16879816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The contribution of spatial cues to memory: direction, but not cue, changes support response reversal learning.
    Wright SL; Williams D; Evans JH; Skinner DM; Martin GM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 19364227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The organization of room geometry and object layout geometry in human memory.
    Sluzenski J; McNamara TP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Aug; 18(4):758-66. PubMed ID: 21538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mental representations of recently learned nested environments.
    Wang Y; Yu X; Dou Y; McNamara TP; Li J
    Psychol Res; 2021 Nov; 85(8):2922-2934. PubMed ID: 33211160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
    De Goede M; Postma A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Memory consolidation of landmarks in good navigators.
    Janzen G; Jansen C; van Turennout M
    Hippocampus; 2008; 18(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 17924521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 17311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrieving enduring spatial representations after disorientation.
    Li X; Mou W; McNamara TP
    Cognition; 2012 Aug; 124(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 22682765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Integration of visuospatial information encoded from different viewpoints.
    Adamou C; Avraamides MN; Kelly JW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):659-65. PubMed ID: 24186271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The choice of intrinsic axis under multi-cue conditions.
    Li J; Xie N; Zhao W
    Cogn Process; 2019 May; 20(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 30661154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inhibition within a reference frame during the interpretation of spatial language.
    Carlson LA; Van Deman SR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):384-407. PubMed ID: 17449023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Switching imagined viewpoints: the effects of viewing angle and layout size.
    Tlauka M
    Br J Psychol; 2002 May; 93(Pt 2):193-201. PubMed ID: 12031147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.