146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17201565)
1. The role of memory for past test in the underconfidence with practice effect.
Finn B; Metcalfe J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):238-44. PubMed ID: 17201565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of pervasiveness of the underconfidence-with-practice effect: boundary conditions and an explanation via anchoring.
Scheck P; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 15702968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidence-with-practice effect?
Serra MJ; Dunlosky J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1258-66. PubMed ID: 16393045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Memory for Past Test.
Finn B; Metcalfe J
J Mem Lang; 2008 Jan; 58(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 19079570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.
Koriat A; Sheffer L; Ma'ayan H
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12049237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
Tiede HL; Leboe JP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age differences in the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
Rast P; Zimprich D
Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):400-31. PubMed ID: 20183099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning.
Sikström S; Jönsson F
Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):932-50. PubMed ID: 16262474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple bases for young and older adults' judgments of learning in multitrial learning.
Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):474-83. PubMed ID: 21942899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
Jang Y; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
Zawadzka K; Higham PA
Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The contributions of anchoring and past-test performance to the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
England BD; Serra MJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):715-22. PubMed ID: 22477335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Multiple Cues In Addition to Memory for Past Test Accuracy.
Hertzog C; Hines JC; Touron DR
Arch Sci Psychol; 2013; 1(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 25914865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
Rhodes MG; Castel AD
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review.
Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
Psychol Bull; 2011 Jan; 137(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 21219059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metacognition in prospective memory: are performance predictions accurate?
Schnitzspahn KM; Zeintl M; Jäger T; Kliegel M
Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Mar; 65(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 21443326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiple study trials and judgments of learning.
Meeter M; Nelson TO
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jun; 113(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 12750044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
