These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17201565)

  • 21. A stability bias in human memory: overestimating remembering and underestimating learning.
    Kornell N; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):449-68. PubMed ID: 19883130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Younger and older adults weigh multiple cues in a similar manner to generate judgments of learning.
    Hines JC; Hertzog C; Touron DR
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2015; 22(6):693-711. PubMed ID: 25827630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does the amount of material to be remembered influence judgements of learning (JOLs)?
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Memory; 2010 Apr; 18(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 20408044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. People use the memory for past-test heuristic as an explicit cue for judgments of learning.
    Serra MJ; Ariel R
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1260-72. PubMed ID: 24898119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall and Monitoring (PRAM).
    Nelson TO; Narens L; Dunlosky J
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Mar; 9(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 15053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 17352622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
    Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using the past to predict the future.
    Dougherty MR; Scheck P; Nelson TO; Narens L
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1096-115. PubMed ID: 16496729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do judgments of learning predict automatic influences of memory?
    Undorf M; Böhm S; Cüpper L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):882-96. PubMed ID: 26595068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The testing effect as a function of explicit testing instructions and judgments of learning.
    Jönsson FU; Hedner M; Olsson MJ
    Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):251-7. PubMed ID: 22580409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attributing study effort to data-driven and goal-driven effects: implications for metacognitive judgments.
    Koriat A; Nussinson R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1338-43. PubMed ID: 19686026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: evidence for a reduction in general memory strength.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):863-75. PubMed ID: 17723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.
    Mazzoni G; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1263-74. PubMed ID: 8744965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implicit memory influences on metamemory during verbal learning after traumatic brain injury.
    Ramanathan P; Kennedy MR; Marsolek CJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1817-30. PubMed ID: 24824746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Subjective learning discounts test type: evidence from an associative learning and transfer task.
    Touron DR; Hertzog C; Speagle JZ
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(5):327-37. PubMed ID: 20178957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accelerated relearning after retrieval-induced forgetting: the benefit of being forgotten.
    Storm BC; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):230-6. PubMed ID: 18194065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.