282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17201943)
1. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteric calculi: efficacy and patient satisfaction.
Ghalayini IF; Al-Ghazo MA; Khader YS
Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(6):656-64; discussion 664-7. PubMed ID: 17201943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi.
Pearle MS; Nadler R; Bercowsky E; Chen C; Dunn M; Figenshau RS; Hoenig DM; McDougall EM; Mutz J; Nakada SY; Shalhav AL; Sundaram C; Wolf JS; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1255-60. PubMed ID: 11547053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.
Strohmaier WL; Schubert G; Rosenkranz T; Weigl A
Eur Urol; 1999 Nov; 36(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 10516445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness.
Bierkens AF; Hendrikx AJ; De La Rosette JJ; Stultiens GN; Beerlage HP; Arends AJ; Debruyne FM
Br J Urol; 1998 Jan; 81(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 9467473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and intracorporeal lithotripsy for proximal ureteric calculi--a comparative assessment of efficacy and safety.
Fong YK; Ho SH; Peh OH; Ng FC; Lim PH; Quek PL; Ng KK
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2004 Jan; 33(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 15008569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.
Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ureteroscopy and pneumatic lithotripsy, followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral stones.
Gurbuz ZG; Gonen M; Fazlioglu A; Akbulut H
Int J Urol; 2002 Aug; 9(8):441-4. PubMed ID: 12225341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Distal ureteral lithiasis. ESWL versus ambulatory URS].
Miján Ortiz JL; Gutiérrez Tejero F; López Carmona F; Nogueras Ocaña M; Arrabal Martín M; Zuluaga Gómez A
Arch Esp Urol; 2001 Nov; 54(9):983-7. PubMed ID: 11789375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ureteroscopic pneumatic versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones.
Islam M; Malik A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Jul; 22(7):444-7. PubMed ID: 22747865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prospective trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi].
Marchant F; Storme O; Osorio F; Benavides J; Palma C; Ossandón E
Actas Urol Esp; 2009 Sep; 33(8):869-72. PubMed ID: 19900380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost analysis of ureteroscopy (URS) vs extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of ureteric stones <10 mm in adults: a UK perspective.
Constanti M; Calvert RC; Thomas K; Dickinson A; Carlisle S
BJU Int; 2020 Mar; 125(3):457-466. PubMed ID: 31663246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distal ureteral calculi: ureteroscopy vs. ESWL. A prospective analysis.
Deliveliotis C; Stavropoulos NI; Koutsokalis G; Kostakopoulos A; Dimopoulos C
Int Urol Nephrol; 1996; 28(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 9061420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal therapy for the distal ureteral stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy.
Anderson KR; Keetch DW; Albala DM; Chandhoke PS; McClennan BL; Clayman RV
J Urol; 1994 Jul; 152(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 8201689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ureterorenoscopy (URS) in treatment of ureteral calculi. I. Safety and effectiveness of URS as auxiliary treatment after ESWL].
Fernandez De la Maza S; Noldus J; Huland H
Urologe A; 1999 Mar; 38(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 10231932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of ureteroscopy to in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi.
Turk TM; Jenkins AD
J Urol; 1999 Jan; 161(1):45-6; discussion 46-7. PubMed ID: 10037364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Symptomatic small non-obstructing lower ureteric calculi: comparison of ureteroscopy and extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Andankar MG; Maheshwari PN; Saple AL; Mehta V; Varshney A; Bansal B
J Postgrad Med; 2001; 47(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11832618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteric calculi: a cost-effectiveness study.
Izamin I; Aniza I; Rizal AM; Aljunid SM
Med J Malaysia; 2009 Mar; 64(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19852314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
