These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17203039)

  • 1. Advances in biology reveal truth about prokaryotes.
    Dolan MF; Margulis L
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7123):21. PubMed ID: 17203039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concept of a bacterium still valid in prokaryote debate.
    Cavalier-Smith T
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7133):257. PubMed ID: 17361157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The modern concept of the procaryote.
    Whitman WB
    J Bacteriol; 2009 Apr; 191(7):2000-5; discussion 2006-7. PubMed ID: 19168606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predation between prokaryotes and the origin of eukaryotes.
    Davidov Y; Jurkevitch E
    Bioessays; 2009 Jul; 31(7):748-57. PubMed ID: 19492355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rebuttal: the modern concept of the procaryote.
    Pace NR
    J Bacteriol; 2009 Apr; 191(7):2006-7. PubMed ID: 19168604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Updating prokaryotic taxonomy.
    Rosselló-Mora R
    J Bacteriol; 2005 Sep; 187(18):6255-7. PubMed ID: 16159756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for an early prokaryotic endosymbiosis.
    Lake JA
    Nature; 2009 Aug; 460(7258):967-71. PubMed ID: 19693078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time for a change.
    Pace NR
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7091):289. PubMed ID: 16710401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes.
    Tindall BJ; Rosselló-Móra R; Busse HJ; Ludwig W; Kämpfer P
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 60(Pt 1):249-266. PubMed ID: 19700448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public discussion on a proposed revision of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Oren A; Arahal DR; Rosselló-Móra R; Sutcliffe IC; Moore ERB
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2021 Jun; 71(6):. PubMed ID: 34191704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Redefining homonyms under Rule 51b (4) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Dec; 66(12):5618-5619. PubMed ID: 27707432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of the term 'standing in nomenclature', as used in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 69(7):2166-2168. PubMed ID: 30575500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Further guidelines for the formation of compound specific and subspecific epithets. A proposal to emend Appendix 9 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Oren A; Schink B
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2020 May; 70(5):3561-3562. PubMed ID: 32392120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emendation of Rules 5b, 8, 15 and 22 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to include the rank of phylum.
    Oren A; Arahal DR; Rosselló-Móra R; Sutcliffe IC; Moore ERB
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2021 Jun; 71(6):. PubMed ID: 34161220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Naming classes of prokaryotes based on the rules of Latin grammar.
    Oren A; Chuvochina M; Schink B; Ventura S
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 May; 69(5):1526-1527. PubMed ID: 30801240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How far will we see in the future?
    Nasmyth K
    Mol Biol Cell; 2010 Nov; 21(22):3813-4. PubMed ID: 21079025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposal to modify the Rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to abolish the taxonomic categories Subfamily, Subtribe and Kingdom.
    Oren A
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 May; 69(5):1524-1525. PubMed ID: 30806612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes.
    Meier-Kolthoff JP; Carbasse JS; Peinado-Olarte RL; Göker M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Jan; 50(D1):D801-D807. PubMed ID: 34634793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes.
    Chun J; Oren A; Ventosa A; Christensen H; Arahal DR; da Costa MS; Rooney AP; Yi H; Xu XW; De Meyer S; Trujillo ME
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 68(1):461-466. PubMed ID: 29292687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A positive definition of prokaryotes.
    Martin W; Koonin EV
    Nature; 2006 Aug; 442(7105):868. PubMed ID: 16929275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.