These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17203444)

  • 21. Computer aided detection of masses in mammograms as decision support.
    Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Rijken H; Holland R
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S123-6. PubMed ID: 17209117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of computer-aided detection prompts on the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography.
    Taylor P; Champness J; Given-Wilson R; Johnston K; Potts H
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Feb; 9(6):iii, 1-58. PubMed ID: 15717938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Who could benefit the most from using a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography?
    Jung NY; Kang BJ; Kim HS; Cha ES; Lee JH; Park CS; Whang IY; Kim SH; An YY; Choi JJ
    World J Surg Oncol; 2014 May; 12():168. PubMed ID: 24885214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography.
    Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1475-82. PubMed ID: 17114540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study.
    Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Roubidoux MA; Wilson TE; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Newman JS; Sanjay-Gopal S
    Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):817-27. PubMed ID: 10478252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
    Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms.
    Gromet M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 18356428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
    Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Evaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma].
    Funovics M; Schamp S; Helbich TH; Lackner B; Wunderbaldinger P; Fuchsjäger M; Lechner G; Wolf G
    Rofo; 2001 Mar; 173(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 11293863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CAD systems for mammography: a real opportunity? A review of the literature.
    Bazzocchi M; Mazzarella F; Del Frate C; Girometti R; Zuiani C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Apr; 112(3):329-53. PubMed ID: 17440698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.
    Dromain C; Boyer B; Ferré R; Canale S; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22939365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of standard reading and computer aided diagnosis (CAD) on a proficiency test of screening mammography.
    Ciatto S; Brancato B; Rosselli Del Turco M; Risso G; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Bricolo D; Zappa M
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):59-65. PubMed ID: 12951552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms.
    Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Hendriks JH; Holland R
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):192-200. PubMed ID: 12616008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection.
    Rubin GD; Lyo JK; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Chow LC; Leung AN; Mindelzun R; Schraedley-Desmond PK; Zinck SE; Naidich DP; Napel S
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):274-83. PubMed ID: 15537839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
    Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set.
    Horsch K; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Lan L; Mendelson EB; Hendrick RE
    Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):357-68. PubMed ID: 16864666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Clinical value of computer aided detection system in direct full-field digital mammography: a preliminary evaluation].
    Sun Z; Li S; Xu HM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 85(24):1692-5. PubMed ID: 16251074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: a comparative study.
    Brem RF; Schoonjans JM
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 11222075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.