These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17203690)
1. 'Impact factor' and 'immediacy index' of The National Medical Journal of India. Menezes RG; Mohankumar TS Natl Med J India; 2006; 19(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 17203690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. Liesegang TJ; Shaikh M; Crook JE Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 17276380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Result-based financing of medical research]. Johannessen A; Erik Gilhus N Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Mar; 129(7):638-41. PubMed ID: 19337335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What weight does impact factor carry? Aase S J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Oct; 108(10):1604-7. PubMed ID: 18926118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [National and international impact factor of Revista Española de Cardiología]. Aleixandre Benavent R; Valderrama Zurián JC; Castellano Gómez M; Miguel-Dasit A; Simó Meléndez R; Navarro Molina C Rev Esp Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1241-4. PubMed ID: 15617649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increasing the JIF of mycoses: a challenge with several facets. Korting HC Mycoses; 2007 Sep; 50(5):331. PubMed ID: 17714355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rating Pakistani medical journals using the principles of citation analysis. Ullah M; Butt IF Health Info Libr J; 2008 Mar; 25(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 18251913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Invited commentary on "Level of evidence in four selected rehabilitation journals". Grimby G Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 92(2):304-5. PubMed ID: 21272729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Epidemiologists (of all people) should question journal impact factors. Hernán MA Epidemiology; 2008 May; 19(3):366-8. PubMed ID: 18414080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peers review, editors decide, and then, what? Schachat AP Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):677-8. PubMed ID: 17386274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The positive and negative impacts, and dangers of the impact factor. Scully C Community Dent Health; 2007 Sep; 24(3):130-4. PubMed ID: 17958071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The misused impact factor. Simons K Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):165. PubMed ID: 18845714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Level of evidence in four selected rehabilitation journals. Kocak FU; Unver B; Karatosun V Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 92(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 21272728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. North American perception of the prestige of biomechanics serials. Knudson DV; Chow JW Gait Posture; 2008 May; 27(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 17707642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neutralizing the impact factor culture. Notkins AL Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):191. PubMed ID: 18845731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rise and fall of the Thomson impact factor. Wilcox AJ Epidemiology; 2008 May; 19(3):373-4. PubMed ID: 18414084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical Hypotheses 2006 impact factor rises to 1.3--a vindication of the 'editorial review' system for revolutionary science. Charlton BG Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(5):967-9. PubMed ID: 17706892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of the impact factor. Manske PR J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]