These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17203984)

  • 1. Prediction of error associated with false-positive rate determination for peptide identification in large-scale proteomics experiments using a combined reverse and forward peptide sequence database strategy.
    Huttlin EL; Hegeman AD; Harms AC; Sussman MR
    J Proteome Res; 2007 Jan; 6(1):392-8. PubMed ID: 17203984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximizing the sensitivity and reliability of peptide identification in large-scale proteomic experiments by harnessing multiple search engines.
    Yu W; Taylor JA; Davis MT; Bonilla LE; Lee KA; Auger PL; Farnsworth CC; Welcher AA; Patterson SD
    Proteomics; 2010 Mar; 10(6):1172-89. PubMed ID: 20101609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the resolution limitations of peptide identification algorithms.
    Colaert N; Degroeve S; Helsens K; Martens L
    J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5555-61. PubMed ID: 21995378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A refined method to calculate false discovery rates for peptide identification using decoy databases.
    Navarro P; Vázquez J
    J Proteome Res; 2009 Apr; 8(4):1792-6. PubMed ID: 19714873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modification Site Localization in Peptides.
    Chalkley RJ
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():243-247. PubMed ID: 27975222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. False discovery rate estimation for cross-linked peptides identified by mass spectrometry.
    Walzthoeni T; Claassen M; Leitner A; Herzog F; Bohn S; Förster F; Beck M; Aebersold R
    Nat Methods; 2012 Sep; 9(9):901-3. PubMed ID: 22772729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the confidence of peptide identifications without decoy databases.
    Renard BY; Timm W; Kirchner M; Steen JA; Hamprecht FA; Steen H
    Anal Chem; 2010 Jun; 82(11):4314-8. PubMed ID: 20455556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized sequence databases for tandem mass spectrometry peptide and protein identification.
    Higdon R; Hogan JM; Van Belle G; Kolker E
    OMICS; 2005; 9(4):364-79. PubMed ID: 16402894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Added value for tandem mass spectrometry shotgun proteomics data validation through isoelectric focusing of peptides.
    Heller M; Ye M; Michel PE; Morier P; Stalder D; Jünger MA; Aebersold R; Reymond F; Rossier JS
    J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(6):2273-82. PubMed ID: 16335976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An improved method for the construction of decoy peptide MS/MS spectra suitable for the accurate estimation of false discovery rates.
    Ahrné E; Ohta Y; Nikitin F; Scherl A; Lisacek F; Müller M
    Proteomics; 2011 Oct; 11(20):4085-95. PubMed ID: 21898822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MUDE: a new approach for optimizing sensitivity in the target-decoy search strategy for large-scale peptide/protein identification.
    Cerqueira FR; Graber A; Schwikowski B; Baumgartner C
    J Proteome Res; 2010 May; 9(5):2265-77. PubMed ID: 20199108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Scalable Approach for Protein False Discovery Rate Estimation in Large Proteomic Data Sets.
    Savitski MM; Wilhelm M; Hahne H; Kuster B; Bantscheff M
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2015 Sep; 14(9):2394-404. PubMed ID: 25987413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of tandem MS search algorithms using a target-decoy search strategy.
    Balgley BM; Laudeman T; Yang L; Song T; Lee CS
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2007 Sep; 6(9):1599-608. PubMed ID: 17533222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trade-off between high sensitivity and increased potential for false positive peptide sequence matches using a two-dimensional linear ion trap for tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
    Xie H; Griffin TJ
    J Proteome Res; 2006 Apr; 5(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 16602709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proteomics-grade de novo sequencing approach.
    Savitski MM; Nielsen ML; Kjeldsen F; Zubarev RA
    J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(6):2348-54. PubMed ID: 16335984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mass spectral compatibility of four proteomics stains.
    Ball MS; Karuso P
    J Proteome Res; 2007 Nov; 6(11):4313-20. PubMed ID: 17929854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Global quantitative proteomic profiling through 18O-labeling in combination with MS/MS spectra analysis.
    White CA; Oey N; Emili A
    J Proteome Res; 2009 Jul; 8(7):3653-65. PubMed ID: 19400582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations.
    Elias JE; Haas W; Faherty BK; Gygi SP
    Nat Methods; 2005 Sep; 2(9):667-75. PubMed ID: 16118637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semisupervised model-based validation of peptide identifications in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
    Choi H; Nesvizhskii AI
    J Proteome Res; 2008 Jan; 7(1):254-65. PubMed ID: 18159924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protein identification false discovery rates for very large proteomics data sets generated by tandem mass spectrometry.
    Reiter L; Claassen M; Schrimpf SP; Jovanovic M; Schmidt A; Buhmann JM; Hengartner MO; Aebersold R
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2009 Nov; 8(11):2405-17. PubMed ID: 19608599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.