BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17205322)

  • 1. Scientific misconduct.
    Sundaram M; Rosenthal DI; Hodler J
    Skeletal Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):179. PubMed ID: 17205322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific misconduct, stem cells, and the way ahead.
    Lindblad WJ
    Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(2):101. PubMed ID: 16630096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standards for ethical publication.
    Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
    Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review and fraud.
    Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7122):971-2. PubMed ID: 17183274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Control of research ethics standards by the scientific community is not sufficient].
    Persson A
    Lakartidningen; 2007 Aug 8-21; 104(32-33):2244-7. PubMed ID: 17822203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethics of scientific publication after the human stem cell scandal.
    Benítez-Bribiesca L; Modiano-Esquenazi M
    Arch Med Res; 2006 May; 37(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 16624638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [This is not our medical ethic].
    Harboe M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Sep; 126(17):2283. PubMed ID: 16967071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Peer review: the all-seeing eye].
    Offerhaus L
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Nov; 137(45):2331-3. PubMed ID: 8255342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The petty crimes perpetuated by academia: scientific literature's death by a thousand cuts.
    Slade E; Tamber PS
    Menopause Int; 2007 Sep; 13(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 17785034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A statement on ethics from the HEART group.
    HEART Group
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):859-61. PubMed ID: 18412086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The trouble with replication.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maintaining ethical standards in medical publishing.
    Youngs R; Kenyon G
    J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Jan; 120(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16375774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should journals police scientific fraud?
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud.
    Carrió I
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 16477432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
    Check E; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The manuscript review process.
    Triadafilopoulos G
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Big and small research fraud].
    Nylenna M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Aug; 126(16):2089. PubMed ID: 16932774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.