These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17206896)

  • 1. Primary ureteroscopy for distal-ureteral stones compared with ureteroscopy after failed extracorporeal lithotripsy.
    Tugcu V; Gürbüz G; Aras B; Gurkan L; Otunctemur A; Tasci AI
    J Endourol; 2006 Dec; 20(12):1025-9. PubMed ID: 17206896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ureteroscopy and pneumatic lithotripsy, followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral stones.
    Gurbuz ZG; Gonen M; Fazlioglu A; Akbulut H
    Int J Urol; 2002 Aug; 9(8):441-4. PubMed ID: 12225341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.
    Hautmann S; Friedrich MG; Fernandez S; Steuber T; Hammerer P; Braun PM; Jünemann KP; Huland H
    Urol Int; 2004; 73(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 15539843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.
    Eden CG; Mark IR; Gupta RR; Eastman J; Shrotri NC; Tiptaft RC
    J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9726396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of semirigid ureteroscopy, flexible ureteroscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy for initial treatment of 11-20 mm proximal ureteral stones.
    Kartal I; Baylan B; Çakıcı MÇ; Sarı S; Selmi V; Ozdemir H; Yalçınkaya F
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Apr; 92(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 32255321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.
    Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
    J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy v ureteroscopic manipulation.
    Park H; Park M; Park T
    J Endourol; 1998 Dec; 12(6):501-4. PubMed ID: 9895251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Salvage extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy after failed distal ureteroscopy.
    Aynehchi S; Samadi AA; Gallo SJ; Konno S; Tazaki H; Eshghi M
    J Endourol; 2002 Aug; 16(6):355-8. PubMed ID: 12227908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy for the treatment of impacted ureteral stones.
    Yagisawa T; Kobayashi C; Ishikawa N; Kobayashi H; Toma H
    J Endourol; 2001 Sep; 15(7):697-9. PubMed ID: 11697399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
    Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R
    Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ureteroscopic treatment of multiple distal-ureteral stones.
    Gürbüz ZG; Mimaroglu S; Gürkan L; Oder M; Verim L
    J Endourol; 2006 Dec; 20(12):1022-4. PubMed ID: 17206895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.
    Strohmaier WL; Schubert G; Rosenkranz T; Weigl A
    Eur Urol; 1999 Nov; 36(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 10516445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience.
    Kumar A; Nanda B; Kumar N; Kumar R; Vasudeva P; Mohanty NK
    J Endourol; 2015 Jan; 29(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23914770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy as a primary modality for large proximal ureteral calculi: comparison to rigid ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy.
    Ko YH; Kang SG; Park JY; Bae JH; Kang SH; Cho DY; Park HS; Cheon J; Lee JG; Kim JJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011; 21(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 21190478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
    Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of semirigid ureteroscopy with pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral stone surface area of greater than 30 mm2.
    Ather MH; Nazim SM; Sulaiman MN
    J Endourol; 2009 Apr; 23(4):619-22. PubMed ID: 19335149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in managing upper-ureteral stones.
    Bapat SS; Pai KV; Purnapatre SS; Yadav PB; Padye AS
    J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1425-7. PubMed ID: 18186678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of SWL and URS on health-related quality of life in proximal ureteral stones.
    Ceylan Y; Ucer O; Bozkurt O; Gunlusoy B; Mertoglu O; Zumrutbas AE; Yildiz G; Irer B; Muezzinoglu T; Demir O
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2018 Jun; 27(3):148-152. PubMed ID: 28697638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
    Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
    World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.
    Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.