These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17207077)

  • 21. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.
    Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro study of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: the influence of stud attachments on load transfer to the implant and soft tissue.
    Ichikawa T; Horiuchi M; Wigianto R; Matsumoto N
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 8957878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of magnetic attachment with stress breaker on lateral stress to abutment tooth under overdenture.
    Gonda T; Ikebe K; Ono T; Nokubi T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):1001-6. PubMed ID: 15387841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wear of matrix overdenture attachments after one to eight years of clinical use.
    Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Nader SA; Feine J; de Albuquerque RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 22385696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative study of four retentive anchor systems for implant supported overdentures--retention force changes.
    Bayer S; Steinheuser D; Grüner M; Keilig L; Enkling N; Stark H; Mues S
    Gerodontology; 2009 Dec; 26(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 19371390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mechanical properties of magnetic attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Morton D; Ehring C; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):608-15. PubMed ID: 18761583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features.
    Alsabeeha NH; Payne AG; Swain MV
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 20095190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures - validation of an original force measurement system.
    Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Abi Nader S; Feine J; de Albuquerque Junior RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19912482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures.
    Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments.
    Cheng T; Sun G; Huo J; He X; Wang Y; Ren YF
    J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):1018-23. PubMed ID: 22925922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of retention and wear of a titanium-formed stud overdenture attachment with different interimplant angulations after simulated clinical use: An in vitro study.
    Elsonbaty MA; Alshimy AM; Abdul-Monem MM; Neena AF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):205.e1-205.e10. PubMed ID: 35842280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Wear of ceramic and titanium ball attachments in subjects with an implant-retained overdenture: a controlled clinical trial.
    Büttel AE; Lüthy H; Sendi P; Marinello CP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 22304745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Frictional wear of stud implant overdenture abutments after 2 years of in vitro simulated function.
    Castrillon JM; Piermatti J; Achong-Bowe R; Hardigan P; Thompson J
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(5):54-57. PubMed ID: 35993934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retentive characteristics of Ankylos SynCone conical crown system over long-term use in vitro.
    Zhang RG; Hannak WB; Roggensack M; Freesmeyer WB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18637380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.