These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17207888)

  • 1. Semiautomated finite element mesh generation methods for a long bone.
    Pfeiler TW; Lalush DS; Loboa EG
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Mar; 85(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 17207888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Smooth surface meshing for automated finite element model generation from 3D image data.
    Boyd SK; Müller R
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1287-95. PubMed ID: 15922348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A voxel-based finite element model for the prediction of bladder deformation.
    Chai X; van Herk M; Hulshof MC; Bel A
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 22225275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements.
    Taddei F; Schileo E; Helgason B; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):973-9. PubMed ID: 17169598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High resolution bone material property assignment yields robust subject specific finite element models of complex thin bone structures.
    Pakdel A; Fialkov J; Whyne CM
    J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1454-1460. PubMed ID: 27033728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed tomography landmark-based semi-automated mesh morphing and mapping techniques: generation of patient specific models of the human pelvis without segmentation.
    Salo Z; Beek M; Wright D; Whyne CM
    J Biomech; 2015 Apr; 48(6):1125-32. PubMed ID: 25680299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parameter study for the finite element modelling of long bones with computed-tomography-imaging-based stiffness distribution.
    Wullschleger L; Weisse B; Blaser D; Fürst AE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 21053774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The prospects of estimating trabecular bone tissue properties from the combination of ultrasound, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, microcomputed tomography, and microfinite element analysis.
    van Lenthe GH; van den Bergh JP; Hermus AR; Huiskes R
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Mar; 16(3):550-5. PubMed ID: 11277273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From high-resolution CT data to finite element models: development of an integrated modular framework.
    Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Feb; 12(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18839383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Establishment of an architecture-specific experimental validation approach for finite element modeling of bone by rapid prototyping and high resolution computed tomography.
    Su R; Campbell GM; Boyd SK
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 16908211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A three-dimensional finite element model from computed tomography data: a semi-automated method.
    Cattaneo PM; Dalstra M; Frich LH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 11382079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new cortical thickness mapping method with application to an in vivo finite element model.
    Kim YH; Kim JE; Eberhardt AW
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(9):997-1001. PubMed ID: 23113651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of voxel size-based inaccuracies on the mechanical behavior of thin bone structures.
    Maloul A; Fialkov J; Whyne C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Mar; 39(3):1092-100. PubMed ID: 21120697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine.
    Liebschner MA; Kopperdahl DL; Rosenberg WS; Keaveny TM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 12642762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies.
    Viceconti M; Davinelli M; Taddei F; Cappello A
    J Biomech; 2004 Oct; 37(10):1597-605. PubMed ID: 15336935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
    Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.
    Bourne BC; van der Meulen MC
    J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 15046990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A universal algorithm for an improved finite element mesh generation Mesh quality assessment in comparison to former automated mesh-generators and an analytic model.
    Kaminsky J; Rodt T; Gharabaghi A; Forster J; Brand G; Samii M
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):383-94. PubMed ID: 15863347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a child head analytical dynamic model considering cranial nonuniform thickness and curvature - Applying to children aged 0-1 years old.
    Li Z; Ji C; Wang L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 161():181-189. PubMed ID: 29852960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.