596 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17207985)
1. Assessment of bacterial community structure in a long-term copper-polluted ex-vineyard soil.
Dell'Amico E; Mazzocchi M; Cavalca L; Allievi L; Andreoni V
Microbiol Res; 2008; 163(6):671-83. PubMed ID: 17207985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microbial community structure and activity in arsenic-, chromium- and copper-contaminated soils.
Turpeinen R; Kairesalo T; Häggblom MM
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 Jan; 47(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 19712345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial diversity promotes community stability and functional resilience after perturbation.
Girvan MS; Campbell CD; Killham K; Prosser JI; Glover LA
Environ Microbiol; 2005 Mar; 7(3):301-13. PubMed ID: 15683391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of soil heavy metals pollution on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity, and community composition near a copper smelter.
Wang Y; Shi J; Wang H; Lin Q; Chen X; Chen Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 May; 67(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 16828162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of the sensitivity-resistance index to estimate the toxicity of copper on bacteria in copper-contaminated soils.
Kunito T; Senoo K; Saeki K; Oyaizu H; Matsumoto S
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1999 Oct; 44(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 10571465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The dynamics of soil bacterial community structure in response to yearly repeated agricultural copper treatments.
Ranjard L; Nowak V; Echairi A; Faloya V; Chaussod R
Res Microbiol; 2008 May; 159(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 18434097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computational improvements reveal great bacterial diversity and high metal toxicity in soil.
Gans J; Wolinsky M; Dunbar J
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5739):1387-90. PubMed ID: 16123304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acclimation of subsurface microbial communities to mercury.
de Lipthay JR; Rasmussen LD; Oregaard G; Simonsen K; Bahl MI; Kroer N; Sørensen SJ
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2008 Jul; 65(1):145-55. PubMed ID: 18522646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of 16S rDNA-PCR amplification and DGGE fingerprinting for detection of shift in microbial community diversity in Cu-, Zn-, and Cd-contaminated paddy soils.
Li Z; Xu J; Tang C; Wu J; Muhammad A; Wang H
Chemosphere; 2006 Mar; 62(8):1374-80. PubMed ID: 16216305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microbial diversity and activity along the forefields of two receding glaciers.
Sigler WV; Zeyer J
Microb Ecol; 2002 May; 43(4):397-407. PubMed ID: 11953808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Field and microcosm experiments to evaluate the effects of agricultural Cu treatment on the density and genetic structure of microbial communities in two different soils.
Ranjard L; Echairi A; Nowak V; Lejon DP; Nouaïm R; Chaussod R
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2006 Nov; 58(2):303-15. PubMed ID: 17064271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heavy metal impact on bacterial biomass based on DNA analyses and uptake by wild plants in the abandoned copper mine soils.
Guo Z; Megharaj M; Beer M; Ming H; Mahmudur Rahman M; Wu W; Naidu R
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Sep; 100(17):3831-6. PubMed ID: 19349173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbial community succession and bacterial diversity in soils during 77,000 years of ecosystem development.
Tarlera S; Jangid K; Ivester AH; Whitman WB; Williams MA
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2008 Apr; 64(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 18328082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impacts of heavy metal contamination and phytoremediation on a microbial community during a twelve-month microcosm experiment.
Gremion F; Chatzinotas A; Kaufmann K; Von Sigler W; Harms H
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 May; 48(2):273-83. PubMed ID: 19712410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of copper-resistant bacteria and bacterial communities from copper-polluted agricultural soils of central Chile.
Altimira F; Yáñez C; Bravo G; González M; Rojas LA; Seeger M
BMC Microbiol; 2012 Sep; 12():193. PubMed ID: 22950448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resistance and resilience of Cu-polluted soil after Cu perturbation, tested by a wide range of soil microbial parameters.
Deng H; Li XF; Cheng WD; Zhu YG
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2009 Nov; 70(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 19663920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of bacterial community structure in sulfurous-oil-containing soils and detection of species carrying dibenzothiophene desulfurization (dsz) genes.
Duarte GF; Rosado AS; Seldin L; de Araujo W; van Elsas JD
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 67(3):1052-62. PubMed ID: 11229891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microbial response to heavy metal-polluted soils: community analysis from phospholipid-linked fatty acids and ester-linked fatty acids extracts.
Hinojosa MB; Carreira JA; García-Ruíz R; Dick RP
J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(5):1789-800. PubMed ID: 16151231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structure and diversity of arsenic resistant bacteria in an old tin mine area of Thailand.
Jareonmit P; Sajjaphan K; Sadowsky MJ
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Jan; 20(1):169-78. PubMed ID: 20134249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of site and plant species on rhizosphere community structure as revealed by molecular analysis of microbial guilds.
Costa R; Götz M; Mrotzek N; Lottmann J; Berg G; Smalla K
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2006 May; 56(2):236-49. PubMed ID: 16629753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
