These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17208040)

  • 1. The quality of evidence in health informatics: how did the quality of healthcare IT evaluation publications develop from 1982 to 2005?
    de Keizer NF; Ammenwerth E
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jan; 77(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17208040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. STARE-HI--Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics.
    Talmon J; Ammenwerth E; Brender J; de Keizer N; Nykänen P; Rigby M
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Jan; 78(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18930696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of the quality of papers dealing with clinical trails in "Chinese Journal of Burns" during 2000-2004 by the standard of evidence-based medicine].
    Jia CY; Wang YC; Bai F
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 22(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 16680960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery--how good are we?
    Schöller K; Licht S; Tonn JC; Uhl E
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2009 May; 151(5):519-27; discussion 527. PubMed ID: 19337684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
    Massol J; Puech A; Boissel JP;
    Therapie; 2007; 62(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 18206104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care: trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.
    Ammenwerth E; de Keizer N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1289-94. PubMed ID: 15361022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fijian participation in health research: analysis of Medline publications 1965-2002.
    Cuboni HD; Finau SA; Wainiqolo I; Cuboni G
    Pac Health Dialog; 2004 Mar; 11(1):59-78. PubMed ID: 18181444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. For randomized controlled trials, the quality of reports of complementary and alternative medicine was as good as reports of conventional medicine.
    Klassen TP; Pham B; Lawson ML; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):763-8. PubMed ID: 16018911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The randomized controlled trial: gold standard, or merely standard?
    Grossman J; Mackenzie FJ
    Perspect Biol Med; 2005; 48(4):516-34. PubMed ID: 16227664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality in health care. What quality? Judged by which criteria? By whom? How?].
    Bergmann JF; Mahé I
    Therapie; 2001; 56(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 11471381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guideline for good evaluation practice in health informatics (GEP-HI).
    Nykänen P; Brender J; Talmon J; de Keizer N; Rigby M; Beuscart-Zephir MC; Ammenwerth E
    Int J Med Inform; 2011 Dec; 80(12):815-27. PubMed ID: 21920809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applying 'technology assessment' and 'evidence based medicine' theory to interventional radiology. Part 1: Suggestions for the phased evaluation of new procedures.
    Malone DE; Maceneaney PM
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Dec; 55(12):929-37. PubMed ID: 11124072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?
    Machan C; Ammenwerth E; Bodner T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():957-62. PubMed ID: 17108634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of gastric cancer: scrutiny into the clinical evidence based on quality assessment of medical literature of randomized controlled trials.
    Jeung HC; Rha SY; Shin SJ; Ahn JB; Roh JK; Park CH; Noh SH; Chung HC
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2009 Apr; 63(5):919-27. PubMed ID: 18712389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health care providers on the World Wide Web: quality of presentations of surgical departments in Germany.
    Stausberg J; Fuchs J; Hüsing J; Hirche H
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2001; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11583405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The quality of reporting of health informatics evaluation studies: a pilot study.
    Talmon J; Ammenwerth E; Geven T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):193-7. PubMed ID: 17911705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.