These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study. Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison. Schatlo B; Molliqaj G; Cuvinciuc V; Kotowski M; Schaller K; Tessitore E J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 24725180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in overweight and obese patients. Park Y; Ha JW; Lee YT; Sung NY Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):919-24. PubMed ID: 21903482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spinal pedicle fixation. Confirmation of an image-based technique for screw placement. Steinmann JC; Herkowitz HN; el-Kommos H; Wesolowski DP Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Oct; 18(13):1856-61. PubMed ID: 8235872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of screw position on load transfer in lumbar pedicle screws: a non-idealized finite element analysis. Newcomb AG; Baek S; Kelly BP; Crawford NR Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Feb; 20(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 27454197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages. Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Anatomic comparison between spinous process screws and pedicle screws techniques of the second cervical vertebar]. Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Lin HJ; Feng JX; Hu Y; Zhao LJ; Zhou LJ Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2011 Aug; 24(8):659-61. PubMed ID: 21928672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws. Vishnubhotla S; McGarry WB; Mahar AT; Gelb DE Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stability of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the setting of retained facets and posterior fixation using transfacet or standard pedicle screws. Chin KR; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Neagoe A; Gabriel JP; Sung RD; Crawford NR Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 24210638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths. Johnston TL; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Marcu D Spine J; 2006; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a novel technique for surgical repair of spondylolysis in adolescents. Ulibarri JA; Anderson PA; Escarcega T; Mann D; Noonan KJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(18):2067-72. PubMed ID: 16915090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment. Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of fatigue strength of C2 pedicle screws, C2 pars screws, and a hybrid construct in C1-C2 fixation. Su BW; Shimer AL; Chinthakunta S; Salloum K; Ames CP; Vaccaro AR; Bucklen B Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(1):E12-9. PubMed ID: 24108297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]