These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17208499)

  • 1. [Forceps delivery or vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Maillet R
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):81. PubMed ID: 17208499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Forceps delivery or vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Schaal JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 17208497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Forceps verses vacuum extraction: no, forceps AND vacuum extraction!].
    Marpeau L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1208. PubMed ID: 17127090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Sequelae for the infants of vacuum extraction operations with the subsequent application of obstetrical forceps].
    Holota VIa; Sonnyk HT; Odarenko IM
    Pediatr Akus Ginekol; 1979; (3):57-9. PubMed ID: 461009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choice of instrument for vaginal delivery.
    Johanson R
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 9(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 9425578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury.
    Damron DP; Capeless EL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):907-10. PubMed ID: 15467563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indications and maternofetal outcome of instrumental deliveries at the University Teaching Hospital of Yaounde, Cameroon.
    Nkwabong E; Nana PN; Mbu R; Takang W; Ekono MR; Kouam L
    Trop Doct; 2011 Jan; 41(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 20940289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forceps and vacuum extraction.
    Chamberlain G
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Dec; 7(3):511-27. PubMed ID: 7011647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal trends and morbidities of vacuum, forceps, and combined use of both.
    Fong A; Wu E; Pan D; Chung JH; Ogunyemi DA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1886-91. PubMed ID: 24635372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstetric attending physician characteristics and their impact on vacuum and forceps delivery rates: University of California at San Francisco experience from 1977 to 1999.
    Chang AL; Noah MS; Laros RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1299-303. PubMed ID: 12066112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A comparison of forceps and vacuum extraction delivery (author's transl)].
    Schaller A; Schramm M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Feb; 86(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 4439937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Episiotomy and assisted delivery: the end of the recommendations of the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians? A comment on the article, "Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery." BJOG 2008;115:104-8].
    Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Feb; 38(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 19056187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice and instrumental delivery.
    Drife JO
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Jul; 103(7):608-11. PubMed ID: 8688383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome of forceps delivery versus vacuum extraction--a review of 200 cases.
    Achanna S; Monga D
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Dec; 35(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 7761886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Lurie S; Sadan O; Golan A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):426-7; author reply 427. PubMed ID: 16449136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Maternal morbidity after Thierry's spatulas and vacuum deliveries].
    Menard JP; Provansal M; Heckenroth H; Gamerre M; Bretelle F; Mazouni C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Jun; 36(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 18539070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Urinary incontinence and pregnancy, vaginal childbirth and obstetric interventions].
    Foldspang A; Mommsen S; Djurhuus JC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(21):3034-7. PubMed ID: 10850192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Instruments for assisted vaginal delivery.
    Kripke C
    Am Fam Physician; 2011 Jul; 84(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 21766753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.