These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17208970)

  • 21. CM-FRAP-Continuum Mechanics-Based Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching.
    Saito T; Deguchi S
    Curr Protoc; 2023 Jan; 3(1):e655. PubMed ID: 36689324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improved FRAP Measurements on Biofilms.
    Hauth J; Chodorski J; Wirsen A; Ulber R
    Biophys J; 2020 May; 118(10):2354-2365. PubMed ID: 32304636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Localization and mobility of bacterial proteins by confocal microscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Mullineaux CW
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 390():3-15. PubMed ID: 17951677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microscale diffusion properties of the cartilage pericellular matrix measured using 3D scanning microphotolysis.
    Leddy HA; Christensen SE; Guilak F
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Dec; 130(6):061002. PubMed ID: 19045531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigation of binding mechanisms of nuclear proteins using confocal scanning laser microscopy and FRAP.
    Tsibidis GD; Ripoll J
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Aug; 253(4):755-68. PubMed ID: 18538796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diffusion and binding analyzed with combined point FRAP and FCS.
    Im KB; Schmidt U; Kang MS; Lee JY; Bestvater F; Wachsmuth M
    Cytometry A; 2013 Sep; 83(9):876-89. PubMed ID: 23847177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative interpretation of binding reactions of rapidly diffusing species using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Tsibidis GD
    J Microsc; 2009 Mar; 233(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19250459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. DeepFRAP: Fast fluorescence recovery after photobleaching data analysis using deep neural networks.
    Wåhlstrand Skärström V; Krona A; Lorén N; Röding M
    J Microsc; 2021 May; 282(2):146-161. PubMed ID: 33247838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cytoplasmic viscosity near the cell plasma membrane: translational diffusion of a small fluorescent solute measured by total internal reflection-fluorescence photobleaching recovery.
    Swaminathan R; Bicknese S; Periasamy N; Verkman AS
    Biophys J; 1996 Aug; 71(2):1140-51. PubMed ID: 8842251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anomalous photobleaching in fluorescence recovery after photobleaching measurements due to excitation saturation--a case study for fluorescein.
    Braeckmans K; Stubbe BG; Remaut K; Demeester J; De Smedt SC
    J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(4):044013. PubMed ID: 16965170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A quantitative approach to analyze binding diffusion kinetics by confocal FRAP.
    Kang M; Day CA; DiBenedetto E; Kenworthy AK
    Biophys J; 2010 Nov; 99(9):2737-47. PubMed ID: 21044570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching as a probe of diffusion in starch systems.
    Perry PA; Fitzgerald MA; Gilbert RG
    Biomacromolecules; 2006 Feb; 7(2):521-30. PubMed ID: 16471925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. First assessment of diffusion coefficients in model cheese by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP).
    Floury J; Madec MN; Waharte F; Jeanson S; Lortal S
    Food Chem; 2012 Jul; 133(2):551-6. PubMed ID: 25683432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Macromolecular diffusion of biological polymers measured by confocal fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Gribbon P; Hardingham TE
    Biophys J; 1998 Aug; 75(2):1032-9. PubMed ID: 9675204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the Equivalence of FCS and FRAP: Simultaneous Lipid Membrane Measurements.
    Macháň R; Foo YH; Wohland T
    Biophys J; 2016 Jul; 111(1):152-61. PubMed ID: 27410743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Confocal fluorescence anisotropy and FRAP imaging of α-synuclein amyloid aggregates in living cells.
    Roberti MJ; Jovin TM; Jares-Erijman E
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23338. PubMed ID: 21858077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Universal Approach to FRAP Analysis of Arbitrary Bleaching Patterns.
    Blumenthal D; Goldstien L; Edidin M; Gheber LA
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jun; 5():11655. PubMed ID: 26108191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. FRAP to Characterize Molecular Diffusion and Interaction in Various Membrane Environments.
    Pincet F; Adrien V; Yang R; Delacotte J; Rothman JE; Urbach W; Tareste D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158457. PubMed ID: 27387979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Characterization of Cell Boundary and Confocal Effects Improves Quantitative FRAP Analysis.
    Kingsley JL; Bibeau JP; Mousavi SI; Unsal C; Chen Z; Huang X; Vidali L; Tüzel E
    Biophys J; 2018 Mar; 114(5):1153-1164. PubMed ID: 29539401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Photoswitching-free FRAP analysis with a genetically encoded fluorescent tag.
    Morisaki T; McNally JG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e107730. PubMed ID: 25233348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.