These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17209737)

  • 1. Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers.
    Jäkel F; Wichmann FA
    J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(11):1307-22. PubMed ID: 17209737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appearance of the frequency-doubling stimulus at threshold.
    Hogg RE; Anderson AJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1477-82. PubMed ID: 18997091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision criteria in dual discrimination tasks estimated using external-noise methods.
    Zak I; Katkov M; Gorea A; Sagi D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):1042-55. PubMed ID: 22351481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2332-52. PubMed ID: 21735314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification images for detection, contrast discrimination, and identification tasks with a common ideal observer.
    Abbey CK; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2006 Feb; 6(4):335-55. PubMed ID: 16889473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the rate of contrast change on the quality of contrast sensitivity assessment: a comparison of three psychophysical methods.
    Nio YK; Jansonius NM; Lamers P; Mager A; Zeinstra J; Kooijman AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jan; 25(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15649179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Stochastic resonance in weak signal detection by sensory systems].
    Liu J; Li G; Liu SL; Chen YQ
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2004 Oct; 17(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 15926235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast discrimination by the methods of adjustment and two-alternative forced choice.
    Laming D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1774-82. PubMed ID: 24030354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glaucoma affects steady state VEP contrast thresholds before psychophysics.
    Vaegan ; Rahman AM; Sanderson GF
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):547-58. PubMed ID: 18594348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Singularities in the inverse modeling of 2AFC contrast discrimination data.
    Katkov M; Tsodyks M; Sagi D
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):259-66. PubMed ID: 16289197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model for the time-order error in contrast discrimination.
    Alcala-Quintana RO; Garcı A-Perez MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1221-48. PubMed ID: 21337283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Number and density discrimination rely on a common metric: Similar psychophysical effects of size, contrast, and divided attention.
    Tibber MS; Greenwood JA; Dakin SC
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):8. PubMed ID: 22665458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model.
    Yeshurun Y; Carrasco M; Maloney LT
    Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1837-51. PubMed ID: 18585750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing sensitivity estimates from MLDS and forced-choice methods in a slant-from-texture experiment.
    Aguilar G; Wichmann FA; Maertens M
    J Vis; 2017 Jan; 17(1):37. PubMed ID: 28135347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing reliability and sensitivity of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for establishing point tactile thresholds.
    Tracey EH; Greene AJ; Doty RL
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Feb; 105(4):982-6. PubMed ID: 22100625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision strategies for the two-alternative forced choice reminder paradigm.
    Hautus MJ; Shepherd D; Peng M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):729-37. PubMed ID: 21264694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rocket-ship psychophysics. Assessing visual functioning in young children.
    Abramov I; Hainline L; Turkel J; Lemerise E; Smith H; Gordon J; Petry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1984 Nov; 25(11):1307-15. PubMed ID: 6490332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models.
    Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1179-98. PubMed ID: 20436209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What limits performance in the amblyopic visual system: seeing signals in noise with an amblyopic brain.
    Levi DM; Klein SA; Chen I
    J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):1.1-23. PubMed ID: 18484840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A window model for spatial integration in human pattern discrimination.
    Näsänen RE; Kukkonen HT; Rovamo JM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 36(9):1855-62. PubMed ID: 7635659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.