517 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17209788)
1. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation.
Pilloni A; Paolantonio M; Camargo PM
J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):2031-9. PubMed ID: 17209788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions.
Castellanos A; de la Rosa M; de la Garza M; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16579697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Amarante ES; Leknes KN; Skavland J; Lie T
J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):989-98. PubMed ID: 10914803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report.
Spahr A; Haegewald S; Tsoulfidou F; Rompola E; Heijl L; Bernimoulin JP; Ring C; Sander S; Haller B
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1871-80. PubMed ID: 16274306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a semilunar coronally positioned flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 16460241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coronally positioned flap for root coverage: poorer outcomes in smokers.
Silva CO; Sallum AW; de Lima AF; Tatakis DN
J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 16579707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is coronally positioned flap procedure adjunct with enamel matrix derivative or root conditioning a relevant predictor for achieving root coverage? A systemic review.
Cheng YF; Chen JW; Lin SJ; Lu HK
J Periodontal Res; 2007 Oct; 42(5):474-85. PubMed ID: 17760826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and clinical evaluation of a root coverage procedure using a collagen barrier membrane.
Shieh AT; Wang HL; O'Neal R; Glickman GN; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 1997 Aug; 68(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 9287069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of anatomical features on the outcome of gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap and enamel matrix derivative: a 1-year prospective study.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Basso M; Weinstein RL
J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 15948683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term outcome following treatment of multiple Miller class I and II recession defects in esthetic areas of the mouth.
Zucchelli G; De Sanctis M
J Periodontol; 2005 Dec; 76(12):2286-92. PubMed ID: 16332241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between micro- and macrosurgical techniques for the treatment of localized gingival recessions using coronally positioned flaps and enamel matrix derivative.
Andrade PF; Grisi MF; Marcaccini AM; Fernandes PG; Reino DM; Souza SL; Taba M; Palioto DB; Novaes AB
J Periodontol; 2010 Nov; 81(11):1572-9. PubMed ID: 20583919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coronally positioned flap plus resin-modified glass ionomer restoration for the treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Santamaria MP; Suaid FF; Casati MZ; Nociti FH; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Apr; 79(4):621-8. PubMed ID: 18380554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Molina GO; Souza SL; Taba M; Grisi MF
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1477-84. PubMed ID: 11759858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study.
Moses O; Artzi Z; Sculean A; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Romanos GE; Nemcovsky CE
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16460244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
