These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17209907)

  • 1. Value of DNA tests: a decision perspective.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Bernard M; Champod C
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17209907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision analysis in forensic science.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):894-905. PubMed ID: 16078494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.
    Curran JM; Gill P; Bill MR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15607589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
    Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The decision theory of paternity disputes: optimization considerations applied to multilocus DNA fingerprinting.
    Krawczak M; Schmidtke J
    J Forensic Sci; 1992 Nov; 37(6):1525-33. PubMed ID: 1453166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures.
    Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1999; 39(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 10795411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision theoretic properties of forensic identification: underlying logic and argumentative implications.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 May; 177(2-3):120-32. PubMed ID: 18187279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific standards for studies in forensic genetics.
    Schneider PM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):238-43. PubMed ID: 16875790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Application of MiniFiler kit in forensic DNA testing of low copy number template].
    Tang JP; Wu D; Zhang C; Zhou HG
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 23(4):304-6. PubMed ID: 17896528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [SNP pentaplex--the allele frequency database of central Poland population].
    Babol-Pokora K; Prośniak A; Jacewicz R; Berent J
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2006; 56(4):228-31. PubMed ID: 17249369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A grey zone approach for evaluation of 15 short tandem repeat loci in sibship analysis: a pilot study in Indian subjects.
    Giroti RI; Verma S; Singh K; Malik R; Talwar I
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2007 Jul; 14(5):261-5. PubMed ID: 17052943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Placing the Bayesian network approach to patient diagnosis in perspective.
    Lipsky AM; Lewis RJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Mar; 45(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 15726052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cautionary note on the evaluation of genetic evidence from uniparentally transmitted markers.
    Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):376-8. PubMed ID: 19083851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The central Poland population database of 500 SNP alleles].
    Babol-Pokora K; Prośniak A; Jacewicz R; Berent J
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2008; 58(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 18767499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.
    Egeland T; Sheehan N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19083824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
    Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The DNA database search controversy revisited: bridging the Bayesian-frequentist gap.
    Storvik G; Egeland T
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):922-5. PubMed ID: 17825021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated forensic DNA purification optimized for FTA card punches and identifiler STR-based PCR analysis.
    Tack LC; Thomas M; Reich K
    Clin Lab Med; 2007 Mar; 27(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17416311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.