419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17210165)
1. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.
Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):745-56. PubMed ID: 16529783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Pinhas A; Aviel M; Koen M; Gurgov S; Acosta V; Israel M; Kakuriev L; Guskova E; Fuzailov I; Touzani K; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 21945373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():156-63. PubMed ID: 25497884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking.
Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):734-44. PubMed ID: 16530236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contribution of orosensory stimulation to strain differences in oil intake by mice.
Glendinning JI; Feld N; Goodman L; Bayor R
Physiol Behav; 2008 Oct; 95(3):476-83. PubMed ID: 18691606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ghrelin signaling is not essential for sugar or fat conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Sclafani A; Touzani K; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2015 Oct; 149():14-22. PubMed ID: 26003495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Profound differences in fat versus carbohydrate preferences in CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J mice: Role of fat taste.
Sclafani A; Vural AS; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2018 Oct; 194():348-355. PubMed ID: 29933030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.
Bachmanov AA; Beauchamp GK
Physiol Behav; 2008 Jan; 93(1-2):37-43. PubMed ID: 17764708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions.
Sclafani A; Glendinning JI
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2005 Sep; 289(3):R712-20. PubMed ID: 15845881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential fructose and glucose appetition in DBA/2, 129P3 and C57BL/6 × 129P3 hybrid mice revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
Nashed M; Castillo A; Roland M; Carata I; Berglas E; Pines R; Riaz S; Morisset BJ; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2021 Nov; 241():113590. PubMed ID: 34509472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2016 Oct; 165():286-90. PubMed ID: 27526998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic variance contributes to ingestive processes: a survey of eleven inbred mouse strains for fat (Intralipid) intake.
Lewis SR; Dym C; Chai C; Singh A; Kest B; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2007 Jan; 90(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 17028044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.
Bachmanov AA; Tordoff MG; Beauchamp GK
Chem Senses; 2001 Sep; 26(7):905-13. PubMed ID: 11555485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oral, post-oral and genetic interactions in sweet appetite.
Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2006 Nov; 89(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 16647093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
Kraft TT; Huang D; Lolier M; Warshaw D; LaMagna S; Natanova E; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():64-9. PubMed ID: 26485292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Taste-evoked responses to sweeteners in the nucleus of the solitary tract differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.
McCaughey SA
J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 17202470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flavor preference conditioning as a function of fat source.
Ackroff K; Lucas F; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2005 Jul; 85(4):448-60. PubMed ID: 15990126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential patterns of opioid and dopamine D1 receptor antagonism on nutritive and non-nutritive sweetener intakes in C57BL/6:129 hybrid mice relative to inbred C57BL/6 and 129 mice.
Roland M; Berglas E; Pines R; Carata I; Castillo A; Nashed M; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2023 Feb; 223():173514. PubMed ID: 36642390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
