446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17210952)
1. Hwang case review committee misses the mark.
Rossner M
J Cell Biol; 2007 Jan; 176(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 17210952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [When the editor makes an error].
Hem E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Oct; 128(20):2303. PubMed ID: 19096482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Big and small research fraud].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Aug; 126(16):2089. PubMed ID: 16932774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Under suspicion.
Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7293):1245. PubMed ID: 20428116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
Malay DS
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Lakartidningen's scrutiny routines--equal to the heavies. The peer review system and the expert editorial staff guarantee scientific quality].
Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Bågedahl-Strindlund M; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Ostergren J
Lakartidningen; 2003 Nov; 100(48):3934-6. PubMed ID: 14717088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Image manipulation: CSI: cell biology.
Pearson H
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7036):952-3. PubMed ID: 15846316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The manuscript review process.
Triadafilopoulos G
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Authorship and co-authorship].
Haug C
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(4):429. PubMed ID: 16477275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reactions to the Hwang scandal.
Martin TJ
Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):606-7. PubMed ID: 16459361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].
Thörn A
Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. All the lonely people: by Caveman.
J Cell Sci; 2004 Aug; 117(Pt 17):3705-6. PubMed ID: 15286170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Adam D; Knight J
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Publication ethics.
Hays JC
Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [How strict should editors be? Nothing is done for the sake of errors].
Eklund J
Lakartidningen; 2004 Dec; 101(51-52):4250. PubMed ID: 15658596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Criticism with only little inhibitions?].
Henriksen P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Sep; 128(18):2087-8; discussion 2088. PubMed ID: 18846128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Criticism without inhibitions].
Aavitsland P
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Jun; 128(12):1377. PubMed ID: 18552894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Beautification and fraud.
Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 16450003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
