BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17211017)

  • 1. Evidence, appropriateness, and technology assessment in cardiology: a case study of computed tomography.
    Redberg RF
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 17211017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of technology assessment in health benefits coverage for medical devices.
    Braslow NM; Shatin D; McCarthy DB; Newcomer LN
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP139-50. PubMed ID: 10185990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technology assessment, coverage decisions, and conflict: the role of guidelines.
    Sheingold SH
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP117-25. PubMed ID: 10185988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technology assessment and coverage decision making.
    McGivney WT
    AAPPO J; 1994; 4(5):11-2, 14-7. PubMed ID: 10150666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost and effectiveness: approval and payment for Pulverizer.
    Riegelman R
    Md Med; 2002; 3(3):50-4. PubMed ID: 12214498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group.
    ; ; ; ; ; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Oct; 3(10):751-71. PubMed ID: 17412166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can surgical innovation survive? Panel presentations.
    McKneally MF; Gleeson S; Balch CM; Mussallem MA; Abel DB; Bernhard VM
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1996 Apr; 81(4):8-21, 43. PubMed ID: 10156765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers.
    Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Satisfying the requirements of the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services.
    Smith JJ; Henderson JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Mar; 5(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 18312966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A changing paradigm in the study and adoption of emerging health care technologies: coverage with evidence development.
    Wallner PE; Konski A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Nov; 5(11):1125-9. PubMed ID: 18954812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hurdles to technology diffusion: what are expectations for PET?
    McGivney WT
    J Nucl Med; 1991 Apr; 32(4):660-4. PubMed ID: 2013804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The changing environment for technological innovation in health care.
    Goodman CS; Gelijns AC
    Baxter Health Policy Rev; 1996; 2():267-315. PubMed ID: 11066263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness and evidence evaluation as criteria for coverage policy.
    Garber AM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-284-96. PubMed ID: 15451997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating new technology without going broke.
    Starr C
    State Health Care Am; 2002; ():29-34. PubMed ID: 12235761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A model for technology assessment applied to pulse oximetry. The Technology Assessment Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
    Crit Care Med; 1993 Apr; 21(4):615-24. PubMed ID: 8472583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.
    Meropol NJ; Schrag D; Smith TJ; Mulvey TM; Langdon RM; Blum D; Ubel PA; Schnipper LE;
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 27(23):3868-74. PubMed ID: 19581533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [More care for a limited budget; a case for a better use of the efficiency criteria].
    Rutten FF; Brouwer WB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(47):2254-8. PubMed ID: 12481524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reflections on science, judgment, and value in evidence-based decision making: a conversation with David Eddy by Sean R. Tunis.
    Eddy D
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(4):w500-15. PubMed ID: 17580317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.